Using inductive machine learning to identify risk factors for healthcare workers to get infected with highly contagious viruses (based on COVID-19 model)

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2024-2-11.pdf
UDC: 
613.6.02, 616-036.22, 004.8
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2024.2.11.eng
Authors: 

I.A. Egorov1, S.S. Smirnova1,2, A.V. Semenov1,2

Organization: 

1Federal Scientific Research Institute of Viral Infections «Virome», 23 Letnyaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620030, Russian Federation
2Ural State Medical University, 3 Repina St., Ekaterinburg, 620028, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

Epidemic and pandemic spread of highly contagious viruses (SARS-CoV, influenza A virus, Ebola virus, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) has been a trend observed in the first two decades of the 21st century.

The predominant impact made by the biological occupational factor on healthcare workers determines their high occupational risk of infection, a severe disease course and a fatal outcome. Epidemiological data mining based on machine learning algorithms is successfully used in epidemiological practice to identify factors (predictors) contributing to infection in various risk populations.

In this study, the database generated from a survey of 1312 healthcare workers was analyzed intelligently. A total of 6912 machine learning models were implemented. SARS-CoV-2 infection was found to be facilitated by providing medical care to a COVID-19 patient, using a full set of PPE after direct contact with a COVID-19 patient, direct contact with items in the external (hospital) environment, vaccination against COVID-19 after direct contact with a COVID-19 patient, acting as nursing staff (cleaners) and being present during aerosol-generating procedures.

The study identified four groups of predictors determining SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers: contact with a COVID-19 patient and environmental items, PPE quality and complexity, occupational affiliation of healthcare workers and their BMI values. One predictor was found in 56.2 % of healthcare workers; two, in 19.2 %; three, in 16.4 %; four, in 5.5 %; and five predictors, in 2.7 %.

Thus, epidemiological data mining is a modern stage in epidemiological analysis. The use of machine learning methods allows for multifactorial assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection risks in healthcare workers and enables identifying and reliably estimating the most significant predictors. Intelligent data analysis has flexible architecture, which allows adjusting the model under study and supplementing new data to the existing database, detecting changes in an epidemiological situation and accomplishing relevant preventive and anti-epidemic activities.

Keywords: 
data mining, artificial intelligence, machine learning, risk-based approach, occupational predictors of infection, highly contagious viruses, SARS-CoV-2, healthcare workers
Egorov I.A., Smirnova S.S., Semenov A.V. Using inductive machine learning to identify risk factors for healthcare workers to get infected with highly contagious viruses (based on COVID-19 model). Health Risk Analysis, 2024, no. 2, pp. 122–131. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2024.2.11.eng
References: 
  1. Baker R.E., Mahmud A.S., Miller I.F., Rajeev M., Rasambainarivo F., Rice B.L., Takahashi S., Tatem A.J. [et al.]. Infectious disease in an era of global change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2022, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 193–205. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-021-00639-z
  2. Sagaya Jansi R., Khusro A., Agastian P., Alfarhan A., Al-Dhabi N.A., Arasu M.V., Rajagopal R., Barcelo D., Al-Tamimi A. Emerging paradigms of viral diseases and paramount role of natural resources as antiviral agents. Sci. Total Environ., 2021, vol. 759, pp. 143539. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143539
  3. Ashmore P., Sherwood E. An overview of COVID-19 global epidemiology and discussion of potential drivers of var-iable global pandemic impacts. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 2023, vol. 78, suppl. 2, pp. ii2–ii11. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad311
  4. Tian C., Lovrics O., Vaisman A., Chin K.J., Tomlinson G., Lee Y., Englesakis M., Parotto M., Singh M. Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 2022, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 639–650. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.18
  5. Gholami M., Fawad I., Shadan S., Rowaiee R., Ghanem H., Hassan Khamis A., Ho S.B. COVID-19 and healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis., 2021, vol. 104, pp. 335–346. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.013
  6. Seto W.H., Tsang D., Yung R.W.H., Ching T.Y., Ng T.K., Ho M., Ho L.M., Peiris J.S.M., Advisors of Expert SARS group of Hospital Authority. Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet, 2003, vol. 361, no. 9368, pp. 1519–1520. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13168-6
  7. Zhang Y., Seale H., Yang P., MacIntyre C.R., Blackwell B., Tang S., Wang Q. Factors associated with the transmis-sion of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among hospital healthcare workers in Beijing, China. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses, 2013, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 466–471. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12025
  8. Olu O., Kargbo B., Kamara S., Wurie A.H., Amone J., Ganda L., Ntsama B., Poy A. [et al.]. Epidemiology of Ebola virus disease transmission among health care workers in Sierra Leone, May to December 2014: a retrospective descriptive study. BMC Infect. Dis., 2015, vol. 15, pp. 416. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1166-7
  9. Alraddadi B.M., Al-Salmi H.S., Jacobs-Slifka K., Slayton R.B., Estivariz C.F., Geller A.I., Al-Turkistani H.H., Al-Rehily S.S. [et al.]. Risk Factors for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection among Healthcare Personnel. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2016, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1915–1920. DOI: 10.3201/eid2211.160920
  10. Smirnova S.S., Egorov I.А., Zhuikov N.N., Vyatkina L.G., Kharitonov А.N., Semenov А.V., Morova О.V. Risks of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 for medical personnel in a large industrial city during the pandemic: comparative assessment. Health Risk Analysis, 2022, no. 2, pp. 139–150. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2022.2.13.eng
  11. Zhang P., Chen B., Ma L., Li Z., Song Z., Duan W., Qiu X. The Large Scale Machine Learning in an Artificial Society: Prediction of the Ebola Outbreak in Beijing. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2015, vol. 2015, pp. 531650. DOI: 10.1155/2015/531650
  12. Alqaissi E.Y., Alotaibi F.S., Ramzan M.S. Modern Machine-Learning Predictive Models for Diagnosing Infectious Diseases. Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2022, vol. 2022, pp. 6902321. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6902321
  13. Singh R., Singh R. Applications of sentiment analysis and machine learning techniques in disease outbreak prediction – A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 1006–1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.356
  14. Abd-Alrazaq A., Alajlani M., Alhuwail D., Schneider J., Al-Kuwari S., Shah Z., Hamdi M., Househ M. Artificial Intelligence in the Fight Against COVID-19: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res., 2020, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. e20756. DOI: 10.2196/20756
  15. Abd-Alrazaq A., Schneider J., Mifsud B., Alam T., Househ M., Hamdi M., Shah Z.A. Comprehensive Overview of the COVID-19 Literature: Machine Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res., 2021, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. e23703. DOI: 10.2196/23703
  16. Guo Y., Zhang Y., Lyu T., Prosperi M., Wang F., Xu H., Bian J. The application of artificial intelligence and data in-tegration in COVID-19 studies: a scoping review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 2021, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 2050–2067. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab098
  17. McCall B. COVID-19 and artificial intelligence: protecting health-care workers and curbing the spread. Lancet Digit. Health, 2020, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. e166–e167. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30054-6
  18. Tostmann A., Bradley J., Bousema T., Yiek W.-K., Holwerda M., Bleeker-Rovers C., Ten Oever J., Meijer C. [et al.]. Strong associations and moderate predictive value of early symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 test positivity among healthcare workers, the Netherlands, March 2020. Euro Surveill., 2020, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2000508. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.16.2000508
  19. Yang H.S., Hou Y., Vasovic L.V., Steel P.A.D., Chadburn A., Racine-Brzostek S.E., Velu P., Cushing M.M. [et al.]. Routine Laboratory Blood Tests Predict SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Machine Learning. Clin. Chem., 2020, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 1396–1404. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa200
  20. Hirten R.P., Tomalin L., Danieletto M., Golden E., Zweig M., Kaur S., Helmus D., Biello A. [et al.]. Evaluation of a machine learning approach utilizing wearable data for prediction of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. JAMIA Open, 2022, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. ooac041. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac04
Received: 
02.02.2024
Approved: 
22.04.2024
Accepted for publication: 
20.06.2024

You are here

Home