Health risk assessment when giving grounds for hygienic criteria of food products safety

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
613.2
Authors: 

P.Z. Shur, N.V. Zaitseva

Organization: 

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, 82 Monastyrskaya Str., Perm, 614045, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

Safety of any product, including food, is viewed as absence of unacceptable risks for life and health. Given that, we propose methodical approaches to health risk assessment in substantiating hygienic standards for contaminants contents in food products; these standards are to be harmonized with internationally accepted principles and supplemented with a methodology recommended by the Eurasian Economic Commission. We describe approaches to assessment of product risks with application of health risk evolution modeling; when giving grounds for hygienic standards, these approaches allow to predict health risk evolution over a period during which a consumer contacts a product; to calculate risk levels for different consumer groups, including sensitive ones; to model health risk as per preset exposure scenarios.

The article contains some examples of setting hygienic requirements to contents of chemical contaminants and biological agents in food products. Thus, a hygienic standard for contents of tetracycline antibiotics in meat products was fixed taking into account consequences of gut organisms imbalance as an increased risk of digestive organs diseases, dermatitis, food allergy, or blood diseases. When a hygienic standard for ractopamine contents in meat products was being fixed, it was shown that its occurrence in any concentration that can be detected with contemporary techniques caused unacceptable health risk in a form of functional disorders in the circulatory system. Therefore, ractopamine was to be prohibited in any concentration. When maximum permissible nitrates contents in fruit and vegetable was being substantiated, experts took into account both carcinogenic risks caused by transformation of nitrates into nitrosoamines, and health risks related to methemoglobin formation. Hygienic requirements to permissible listeria contents in food products ready for consumption were substantiated taking into account quantities of such products (primarily, dairy ones) recommended for consumption by sensitive population groups (first of all, pregnant and breast-feeding women).

The outlined experience accumulated in health risk assessment when giving grounds for hygienic criteria of food products safety in the EAEU and Russia can be useful for improvement and international harmonization of risk assessment. It is advisable to consider such basic aspects in the process as possible convergence of scientific approaches to assessing consumer health risks when substantiating hygienic standards, harmonization of risk assessment tools, exchange of experience and a constructive international discussion on practices related to substantiation of hygienic standards.

Keywords: 
health risk assessment, hygienic standards, food products, hazard factors, level of exposure, international harmonization of risk assessment
Shur P.Z., Zaitseva N.V. Health risk assessment when giving grounds for hygienic criteria of food products safety. Health Risk Analysis, 2018, no. 4, pp. 43–56. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2018.4.05.eng
References: 
  1. CAC/GL 62-2007 Working Principles for Risk Analysis for Food Safety for Application by Governments. Rome, 2007, 41 p.
  2. Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. Thirty-sixth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser., 1990, vol. 799, pp. 1–68.
  3. Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food: fiftieth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1999, 108 p.
  4. Toxicological evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. WHO Food Additives Series, 1996, № 38, nos 873–883 on INCHEM. Available at: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/monographs/en/ (16.04.2017).
  5. Zaitseva N.V., Shur P.Z., Aminov A.I., Kiryanov D.A., Kamaltdinov M.R. To estimate the additional risk of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract associated with dysbiosis of the intestinal microflora due to the impact of tetracycline residues in foods. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2012, no. 7, pp. 46–48 (in Russian).
  6. Moubareck C., Gavini F., Vaugien L., Butel M.J., Doucet-Populaire F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2005, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 38–44.
  7. Foodborne listeriosis. Report of the WHO Working Group. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1988, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 421–428.
  8. Mead P.S., Slutsker L., Dietz V., McCraig L.F., Bresee S., Shapiro C., Griffin P.M., Tauxe R.V. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 1999, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 607–625.
  9. CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]. 1998. 1997 Annual Report. CDC/USDA/FDA Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network. CDC's Emerging Infections Program (Revised 14 March 2000). Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&... % 3A % 2F % 2Fwww2a.cdc.gov % 2Fncid % 2Ffoodnet % 2Fsteering % 2F2004 % 2Fjune % 2FJune04_packet.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0UNrRvIsjf23RQ3IeZZOUB (23.03.2017).
  10. FDA/FSIS [U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Food Safety and Inspection Agency (USDA). 2001. Draft Assess-ment of the relative risk to public health from foodborne Listeria monocytogenes among selected categories of ready-to-eat foods. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (FDA) and Food Safety Inspection Service (USDA). Available at: https://www.foodsafety.gov/~dms/lmrisk.html (24.06.2013).
  11. Guidelines On The Application Of General Principles Of Food Hygiene To The Control Of Listeria Monocytogenes In Foods. CAC/GL61-2007, 2007, 28 p. Available at: http://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/10740/CXG_061e.pdf (16.04.2017).
  12. Principles and guidelines for the establishment and application of microbiological criteria related to foods. Codex Alimentarius Volume 1B General requirements (Food hygiene), 1997, 4 p.
  13. Commission regulation (EC) No1441/2007 of 5 December 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No2073/2005 on micro-biological criteria for foodstuffs. EUR-Lex. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/1441/oj (16.04.2017).
  14. Haas C.N. Estimation of risk due to low doses of microorganisms: a comparison of alternative methodologies. Amer-ican journal of epidemiology, 1983, vol. 118, pp. 573–582.
  15. Rose J.B., Haas C.N., Regli S. Risk assessment and control of waterborne giardiasis. American journal of public health, 1991, vol. 81, pp. 709–713.
  16. Risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods: interpretative summary (Microbiological risk as-sessment series; no. 4). Geneva, World Health Organization, 2004, 81 p.
  17. Lindqvist R., Westöö A. Quantitative risk assessment for Listeria monocytogenes in smoked or gravad salm-on/rainbow trout in Sweden. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2000, vol. 58, pp. 181–196.
  18. Rekomenduemye nabory produktov dlya pitaniya beremennykh zhenshchin, kormyashchikh materei i detei do 3-kh let (Razrabotany GU NII pitaniya PAMH) [Food products recommended for consumption by pregnant women, breast-feeding mothers, and children under 3 (Drawn up by Scientific Research Institute for Nutrition of the Russian Academy of Sciences) ]. Registr. Available at: http://www.rlsnet.ru/articles_467.htm (16.04.2017) (in Russian).
  19. Shur P.Z., Kiryanov D.A., Atiskova N.G., Chigvintsev V.M., Khrushcheva E.V. Justificaion of acceptable nitrate levels in crop product using health risk criteria. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2013, vol. 248, no. 11, pp. 47–48 (in Rus-sian).
  20. Shuval H.I., Gruener N. Epidemiological and toxicological aspects of nitrates and nitrites in the environment. Am. J. Public Health, 1972, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1045–1052.
  21. Ingested Nitrate and Nitrite and Cyanobacterial Peptide Toxins. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2010, vol. 94, 464 p.
  22. Metodologiya otsenki riskov zdorov'yu naseleniya pri vozdeistvii khimicheskikh, fizicheskikh i biologicheskikh faktorov dlya opredeleniya pokazatelei bezopasnosti produktsii (tovarov) / Evraziiskaya ekonomicheskaya komissiya [Health risk assessment methodology under exposure to chemical, physical, and biological factors for determining criteria of products (goods) safety / The Eurasian Economic Commission]. Moscow, Yumanite Media, 2014, 115 p. (in Russian).
  23. Kamaltdinov M.R., Kiryanov D.A. The application of recurrent relations for integrated health risk assessment. Zdo-rov'e sem'i - 21 vek, 2011, no. 3. Available at: http://www.fh-21.perm.ru/download/2011-3-6.pdf (16.04.2017) (in Russian).
  24. Zaitseva N.V., Shur P.Z., May I.V., Kiryanov D.A. Approaches to the assessment of integrated health risk population based on evolution of mathematical models. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2011, no. 10, pp. 6–9 (in Russian).
  25. Zaitseva N.V., Shur P.Z., Kiryanov D.A., Kamaltdinov M.R., Tsinker M.Yu. MEthodical approaches for health population risk estimation based evolution models. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2013, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 4–6 (in Rus-sian).
  26. Residue evaluation of certain veterinary drugs. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Meeting 2010 – Eva¬luation of data on ractopamine residues in pig tissues. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1618e/i1618e00.pdf (16.04.2017).
  27. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on a request from the European Commission on the safety evaluation of ractopamine. The EFSA Journal, 2009, vol. 1041, pp. 1–52.
  28. Alemanno A., Capodieci G. Testing the Limits of Global Food Governance: The Case of Ractopamine. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2012, vol. 3, 12 p.
  29. Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. Sixty-second report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO technical report series 925. Rome, 2004. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/hand-le/10665/43039/WHO_TRS_925.pdf? sequence=1 (16.04.2017).
  30. Williams G.D. A Chronic Toxicity Study of Ractopamine Hydrochloride Administered Orally to Beagle Dogs for One Year. Unpublished report on study No. D05885 from Toxicology Division, Lilly Research Laboratories, Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Greenfield, IN, USA. Submitted to WHO by Elanco Animal Health, Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA. June, 1987, 66 p.
  31. WHO. Food additives series: 53 ractopamine (addendum) First draft prepared by Professor Fritz R. Ungemach. IPCS INCHEM. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v53je08.htm (16.04.2017).
  32. Residues of Some Veterinary Drugs in Animals and Foods. FAO. Rome, 1993, 179 p.
Received: 
22.10.2018
Accepted: 
15.11.2018
Published: 
30.12.2018

You are here