Role of polymorphisms of antioxidant genes and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in the development of genetic sensitivity to industrial pollutants: a literature review

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
577:575
Authors: 

D.R. Shaikhova1, A.M. Kikot1, I.A. Bereza1, M.P. Sutunkova1,2

Organization: 

1Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov St., Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation
2Ural State Medical University, 3 Repin St., Yekaterinburg, 620028, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

Polymorphisms of antioxidant genes and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes largely determine individual sensitivity to industrial and environmental pollutants. This study aims to examine and systematize current knowledge on the role of poly-morphisms of antioxidant genes and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the development of genetic sensitivity to industrial pollutants. We conducted an in-depth search for scientific publications in the eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases and selected 32 papers for inclusion in this review. We found that the studies generally focus on certain functional classes of genes: phase I biotransformation, phase II biotransformation, antioxidant defense, and regulatory factors. It should be noted that they either examine the exposure – disease relationship or aim to identify the interplay between various polymorphisms, ROS, and regulatory networks.

Aggregated data prove that polymorphisms of antioxidant and xenobiotic-metabolizing genes modify the risk and severity of diseases related to industrial pollutants. There remain, however, methodological challenges, such as heterogeneity of study designs, differences in exposure assessment, ethnic specificity of allele frequencies, and the potential influence of polygenic background. The investigation of polymorphisms in antioxidant defense genes and the xenobiotic biotransformation system is of fundamental importance for understanding why some individuals and occupatinal groups are more susceptible to exposure to industrial and environmental pollutants. This knowledge allows for the development of a concept of genetically determined susceptibility, refinement of risk assessment, and the foundation for personalized prevention in environmental and occupational health.

Keywords: 
polymorphisms, antioxidant system, xenobiotic biotransformation, regulatory factors, industrial pollution, diseases, literature review, genetic susceptibility
Shaikhova D.R., Kikot A.M., Bereza I.A., Sutunkova M.P. Role of polymorphisms of antioxidant genes and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in the development of genetic sensitivity to industrial pollutants: A literature review. Health Risk Analysis, 2026, no. 3, pp. 184–191. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2026.3.17.eng
References: 
  1. Altynova N., Khamdiyeva O., Garshin A., Baratzhanova G., Amirgaliyeva A., Seisenbayeva A., Abylkassymova G., Yergali K. [et al.]. Case-control study of the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes involved in xenobi-otic detoxification and antioxidant protection with the long-term influence of organochlorine pesticides on the population of the Almaty Region. Toxics, 2023, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 948. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11120948
  2. Álvarez-González B., Hernández A.F., Zafra-Gómez A., Chica-Redecillas L., Cuenca-López S., Vázquez-Alonso F., Martínez-González L.J., Álvarez-Cubero M.J. Exposure to environmental pollutants and genetic variants related to oxidative stress and xenobiotic metabolism – Association with prostate cancer. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2024, vol. 108, pp. 104455. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2024.104455
  3. Martínez-González L.J., Antúnez-Rodríguez A., Vázquez-Alonso F., Hernández A.F., Álvarez-Cubero M.J. Genetic variants in xenobiotic detoxification enzymes, antioxidant defenses and hormonal pathways as biomarkers of susceptibility to prostate cancer. Sci. Total Environ., 2020, vol. 730, pp. 138314. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138314
  4. Thier R., Brüning T., Roos P.H., Rihs H.-P., Golka K., Ko Y., Bolt H.M. Markers of genetic susceptibility in human environmental hygiene and toxicology: the role of selected CYP, NAT and GST genes. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 2003, vol. 206, no. 3, pp. 149–171. DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00209
  5. Álvarez-González B., Porras-Quesada P., Arenas-Rodríguez V., Tamayo-Gómez A., Vázquez-Alonso F., Martínez-González L.J., Hernández A.F., Álvarez-Cubero M.J. Genetic variants of antioxidant and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and their association with prostate cancer: A meta-analysis and functional in silico analysis. Sci. Total Environ., 2023, vol. 898, pp. 165530. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165530
  6. Pavlyuchenko I.I., Klimenko Ya.V., Prozorovskaya Yu.I. Polymorphism of genes related to antioxidant defense systems, xenobiotic biotransformation, and immune regulation in allergic diseases: An observational case-control study. Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik, 2024, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 28–39. DOI: 10.25207/1608-6228-2024-31-6-28-39 (in Rus-sian).
  7. Kostyushok N.Ya., Korol I.V., Ivanova L.A., Pavlyuchenko I.I. The role of gene polymorphisms in the system of bio-transformation of xenobiotics and antioxidant protection in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny, 2023, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 34–39. DOI: 10.20969/vskm.2023.16(1).34-39 (in Russian).
  8. Minina V.I., Savchenko Y.A., Bakanova M.L., Ryzhkova A.V., Glushkov A.N., Sokolova A.O., Meyer A.V., Tolochko T.A. [et al.]. Chromosomal instability and genetic polymorphism in miners and workers of coal thermal power plants. Russian Journal of Genetics, 2020, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 470–480. DOI: 10.1134/s1022795420040079
  9. Koehle C., Bock K.W. Coordinate regulation of Phase I and II xenobiotic metabolisms by the Ah receptor and Nrf2. Biochem. Pharmacol., 2007, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 1853–1862. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.01.009
  10. Kalthoff S., Ehmer U., Freiberg N., Manns M.P., Strassburg C.P. Interaction between oxidative stress sensor Nrf2 and xenobiotic-activated aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the regulation of the human phase II detoxifying
    UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A10. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2010, vol. 285, no. 9, pp. 5993–6002. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.075770
  11. Yadetie F., Butcher S., Førde H.E., Campsteijn C., Bouquet J.-M., Karlsen O.A., Denoeud F., Metpally R. [et al.]. Conservation and divergence of chemical defense system in the tunicate Oikopleura dioica revealed by genome wide response to two xenobiotics. BMC Genomics, 2012, vol. 13, pp. 55. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-55
  12. Dhakshinamoorthy S., Long D.J. 2nd, Jaiswal A.K. Antioxidant regulation of genes encoding enzymes that detoxify xenobiotics and carcinogens. Curr. Top. Cell. Regul., 2000, vol. 36, pp. 201–216. DOI: 10.1016/s0070-2137(01)80009-1
  13. Hayes J.D., Flanagan J.U., Jowsey I.R. Glutathione transferases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 2005, vol. 45, pp. 51–88. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857
  14. Scandalios J.G. Oxidative stress: molecular perception and transduction of signals triggering antioxidant gene defenses. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 2005, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 995–1014. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000700003
  15. Raghunath A., Sundarraj K., Nagarajan R., Arfuso F., Bian J., Kumar A.P., Sethi G., Perumal E. Antioxidant response elements: Discovery, classes, regulation and potential applications. Redox Biol., 2018, vol. 17, pp. 297–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.05.002
  16. Klotz L.-O., Steinbrenner H. Cellular adaptation to xenobiotics: Interplay between xenosensors, reactive oxygen spe-cies and FOXO transcription factors. Redox Biol., 2017, vol. 13, pp. 646–654. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.07.015
  17. Lacher S.E., Lee J.S., Wang X., Campbell M.R., Bell D.A., Slattery M. Beyond antioxidant genes in the ancient Nrf2 regulatory network. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 2015, vol. 88, pt B, pp. 452–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.044
  18. Bortoli S., Boutet-Robinet É., Lagadic-Gossmann D., Huc L. Nrf2 and AhR in metabolic reprogramming after con-taminant exposure. Current Opinion in Toxicology, 2018, vol. 8, pp. 34–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.12.001
  19. Ma Q. Xenobiotic-activated receptors: from transcription to drug metabolism to disease. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2008, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1651–1671. DOI: 10.1021/tx800156s
  20. Hammad M., Raftari M., Cesário R., Salma R., Godoy P., Emami S.N., Haghdoost S. Roles of oxidative stress and Nrf2 signaling in pathogenic and non-pathogenic cells: A possible general mechanism of resistance to therapy. Antioxidants (Basel), 2023, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1371. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12071371
  21. Owuor E.D., Kong A.-N.T. Antioxidants and oxidants regulated signal transduction pathways. Biochem. Pharmacol., 2002, vol. 64, no. 5–6, pp. 765–770. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01137-1
  22. Kong A.N., Owuor E., Yu R., Hebbar V., Chen C., Hu R., Mandlekar S. Induction of xenobiotic enzymes by the MAP kinase pathway and the antioxidant or electrophile response element (ARE/EpRE). Drug Metab. Rev., 2001, vol. 33, no. 3–4, pp. 255–271. DOI: 10.1081/dmr-120000652
  23. Da Silveira Guerreiro A., Monteiro J.S., Medeiros I.D., Sandrini J.Z. First evidence of transcriptional modulation by chlorothalonil in mussels Perna perna. Chemosphere, 2020, vol. 255, pp. 126947. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126947
  24. Lüchmann K.H., Clark M.S., Bainy A.C.D., Gilbert J.A., Craft J.A., Chipman J.K., Thorne M.A.S., Mattos J.J. [et al.]. Key metabolic pathways involved in xenobiotic biotransformation and stress responses revealed by transcriptomics of the mangrove oyster Crassostrea brasiliana. Aquat. Toxicol., 2015, vol. 166, pp. 10–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.06.012
  25. Lüchmann K.H., Dafre A.L., Trevisan R., Craft J.A., Meng X., Mattos J.J., Zacchi F.L., Dorrington T.S. [et al.]. A light in the darkness: new biotransformation genes, antioxidant parameters and tissue-specific responses in oysters exposed to phenanthrene. Aquat. Toxicol., 2014, vol. 152, pp. 324–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.04.021
  26. Regoli F., Giuliani M.E. Oxidative pathways of chemical toxicity and oxidative stress biomarkers in marine organisms. Mar. Environ. Res., 2014, vol. 93, pp. 106–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.07.006
  27. Pujolar J.M., Marino I.A.M., Milan M., Coppe A., Maes G.E., Capoccioni F., Ciccotti E., Bervoets L. [et al.]. Surviving in a toxic world: transcriptomics and gene expression profiling in response to environmental pollution in the critically endangered European eel. BMC Genomics, 2012, vol. 13, pp. 507. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-507
  28. Regoli F., Giuliani M.E., Benedetti M., Arukwe A. Molecular and biochemical biomarkers in environmental monitor-ing: a comparison of biotransformation and antioxidant defense systems in multiple tissues. Aquat. Toxicol., 2011, vol. 105, no. 3–4, suppl., pp. 56–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.06.014
  29. Giuliani M.E., Benedetti M., Arukwe A., Regoli F. Transcriptional and catalytic responses of antioxidant and biotransformation pathways in mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, exposed to chemical mixtures. Aquat. Toxicol., 2013, vol. 134–135, pp. 120–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.03.012
  30. Valavanidis A., Vlahogianni T., Dassenakis M., Scoullos M. Molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress in aquatic or-ganisms in relation to toxic environmental pollutants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2006, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 178–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.013
  31. Tenji D., Mićić B., Sipos S., Miljanović B., Teodorović I., Kaisarevic S. Fish biomarkers from a different perspective: evidence of adaptive strategy of Abramis brama (L.) to chemical stress. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2020, vol. 32, pp. 47. DOI: 10.1186/s12302-020-00316-7
  32. Eide M., Rydbeck H., Tørresen O.K., Lille-Langøy R., Puntervoll P., Goldstone J.V., Jakobsen K.S., Stegeman J. [et al.]. Independent losses of a xenobiotic receptor across teleost evolution. Sci. Rep., 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 10404. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28498-4
Received: 
10.03.2026
Approved: 
27.04.2026
Accepted for publication: 
27.09.2026

You are here