Knowledge, attitude and practices of workers in carcinogenic hazardous industries in the prevention of occupational health risks

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
613.6.01:616-006.6-02-057
Authors: 

K.A. Hutsich, K.A. Nikalayeva

Organization: 

Research Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology, Epidemiology, Virology and Microbiology of the state institution «Republican Center of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Public Health», 8 Akademicheskaya St., Minsk, 220012, Republic of Belarus

Abstract: 

The study object is workers in main and auxiliary occupations exposed to carcinogens.

The aim of the study is to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices of workers in carcinogenic hazardous industries in prevention of occupational health risks and to identify associations with socio-demographic characteristics, behavioral factors and objective working conditions.

A cross sectional descriptive analytical study was carried out using a specially developed author’s structured questionnaire based on the Knowledge, Attitude, Practice (KAP) model.

As a result, we have identified substantial gaps in awareness, heterogeneity of risk perception and a gap between knowledge and actual behavior. Workers’ awareness of occupational carcinogenic risks is insufficient, especially among older age groups and those with lower education. Workers tend to overestimate individual sensory-noticeable factors (noise, dust, and microclimate) and to underestimate the chemical hazard and the overall occupational risk. The attitude towards prevention is generally favorable, with predominant trust in the employer and in personal protective equipment (PPE). High PPE availability and declared frequency of use do not guarantee safe behavior due to ergonomic discomfort and the lack of a direct link between knowledge and practices. The key barriers are inconvenience and thermal discomfort. Hygiene practices are generally observed at a high level; however, workers who recognize a serious impact of work on health more often wash their workwear at home. We have revealed increased prevalence of smoking among women and a high proportion of electronic cigarette users among young workers, as well as a high proportion of workers engaged in night shifts, which are additional carcinogenic risk factors.

To improve effectiveness of prevention, it is necessary not only to provide information, but also to remove barriers that impede compliance with safety measures; to organize centralized laundering of workwear with quality control, and to build trust in organizational protective measures. Training programs should focus on identifying carcinogens and exposure pathways, forming clear algorithms for translating knowledge into action, and paying special attention to older age groups and those with lower education. At the same time, targeted programs to reduce smoking prevalence should be developed for female workforce, and programs to prevent electronic cigarette use among young people are also needed.

Keywords: 
knowledge – attitude – practice, industrial carcinogens, carcinogenic hazardous industries, occupational carcinogenic health risk, prevention, employee survey
Hutsich K.A., Nikalayeva K.A. Knowledge, attitude and practices of workers in carcinogenic hazardous industries in the prevention of occupational health risks. Health Risk Analysis, 2026, no. 3, pp. 106–118. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2026.3.10.eng
References: 
  1. Qu C., He R., Hou W., Ye W., Cao H., Zhang H., Zhang N., Cheng Q. [et al.]. Global burden of neoplasms attributable to specific occupational carcinogens over 30 years: a population-based study. Public Health, 2023, vol. 223, pp. 145–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.07.032
  2. Ekpanyaskul C. Update on occupational cancer for better cancer prevention and control. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2024, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 4465–4476. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4465
  3. Högberg J., Järnberg J. Approaches for the setting of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for carcinogens. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 2023, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 131–167. DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2218887
  4. Zarei F., Dehghani A., Rtansri A., Ghaffari M., Raina S.K., Halimi A., Rakhshanderou S., Isamel S.A. [et al.]. ChecKAP: a checklist for reporting a knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) study. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2024, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2573–2577. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.7.2573
  5. Louzado-Feliciano P., Santiago K.M., Paule L., Rivera G., Schaefer Solle N., Miric M., Perez-Then E., Caban-Martinez A.J. Perceptions of occupational cancer risk and prevention among Dominican Republic firefighters: a qualitative study. J. Occup. Environ. Med., 2022, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. e131–e135. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002466
  6. Langwana V., Khoza N., Rathebe P.C., Mbonane T.P., Masekameni M.D. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on oc-cupation health and safety amongst mine workers exposed to crystalline silica dust in a low-income country: a case study from Lesotho. Safety, 2024, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 76. DOI: 10.3390/safety10030076
  7. Barattucci M., Ramaci T., Matera S., Vella F., Gallina V., Vitale E. Differences in risk perception between the con-struction and agriculture sectors: an exploratory study with a focus on carcinogenic risk. Med. Lav., 2025, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 16796. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16796
  8. Tovstiy M.A., Mazhkenov S.A., Zibarev E.V., Kravchenko O.K., Nikonova S.M. The impact of harmful and danger-ous production factors on the functional state in certain categories of workers, according to a questionnaire survey. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2025, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 1686–1693. DOI: 10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-12-1686-1693 (in Russian).
  9. Zibarev E.V., Vostrikova S.M., Kravchenko O.K., Bessonova A.K., Nikonova S.M. Self-Assessment of Exposure Levels to Harmful Occupational Factors at the Workplaces of Miners. Ekologiya cheloveka, 2025, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 504–516. DOI: 10.17816/humeco685787 (in Russian).
  10. Shannon H.A., Parker A.W. Evaluation of a health literacy instrument designed for the mining industry. Health Lit. Res. Pract., 2020, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. e84–e93. DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20200316-01
  11. Liu Y., Zhang Z., Liu Y. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward the prevention of occupational exposure in public health emergencies among nurses in Wuhan. Front. Public Health, 2024, vol. 12, pp. 1289498. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1289498
  12. Ngah H., Hairon S.M., Hamzah N.A., Noordin S., Shafei M.N. Development and validation of knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire: toward safe working in confined spaces. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1242. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031242
  13. STEPS: rasprostranennost' faktorov riska neinfektsionnykh zabolevanii v Respublike Belarus', 2020 g. [STEPS: Prev-alence of Noncommunicable Disease Risk Factors in the Republic of Belarus, 2020]. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2022, 89 p. (in Russian).
  14. Yusoff M.S.B. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 49–54. DOI: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
  15. Polit D.F., Beck C.T., Owen S.V. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommenda-tions. Res. Nurs. Health, 2007, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 459–467. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20199
  16. Marutsak L.I. Obrabotka dannykh, izmerennykh v shkale Laikerta, s pomoshch'yu teorii nechetkikh mnozhestv [Analysis of Likert scale data using fuzzy set theory]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v nauke, upravlenii, sotsial'noi sfere i med-itsine: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov II Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, Tomsk, May 19–22, 2015. Tomsk, Tomsk Polytechnic Uni-versity Publ., 2015, pp. 880–881 (in Russian).
  17. Duffy R.T., Brobbey A., Rydz E., Quinn E.K., Fazel S.S., Peters C.E. Young workers' perceptions about occupa-tional carcinogens. Work, 2026, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1212–1221. DOI: 10.1177/10519815251382372
  18. Sweet C.M., Telfer J.M., Palmer A.L., Fazel S.S., Peters C.E. Perspective: young workers at higher risk for carcinogen exposures. Front. Public Health, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 869232. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.869232
  19. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans: Night shift work. Lyon, IARC, 2020, vol. 124, 371 p.
  20. Moon J., Ikeda-Araki A., Mun Y. Night shift work and female breast cancer: a two-stage dose-response meta-analysis for the correct risk definition. BMC Public Health, 2024, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 2065. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19518-2
  21. Dun A., Zhao X., Jin X., Wei T., Gao X., Wang Y., Hou H. Association between night-shift work and cancer risk: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol., 2020, vol. 10, pp. 1006. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01006
  22. Olsson A., Bouaoun L., Schüz J., Vermeulen R., Behrens T., Ge C., Kromhout H., Siemiatycki J. [et al.]. Lung cancer risks associated with occupational exposure to pairs of five lung carcinogens: results from a pooled analysis of case-control stud-ies (SYNERGY). Environ. Health Perspect., 2024, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 17005. DOI: 10.1289/EHP13380
  23. Shkembi A., Smith L.M., Neitzel R.L. Risk perception or hazard perception? Examining misperceptions of miners' personal exposures to noise. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 2023, vol. 254, pp. 114263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114263
Received: 
09.07.2026
Approved: 
29.07.2026
Accepted for publication: 
27.09.2026

You are here