Factors of self-preservation and risky behavior of employable population in an industrial megalopolis

UDC: 
614+316.622
Authors: 

S.S. Gordeeva, S.Yu. Sharypova, A.S. Shlyapina

Organization: 

Perm State University, 15 Bukireva St., Perm, 614990, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

Socio-economic stability of any state is determined by the health of employable population, formed by an individual’s behavior, which can be aimed both at preserving health (self-preservation) and at its destruction (risky behavior).

Based on literature analysis, three groups of factors have been identified that determine an individual's behavior in the field of health: socio-biological, socio-economic, and socio-psychological. These factors gave grounds for developing a mathematical model of multifactorial causation of self-preservation and risky behavior pursued by employable population living in an industrial megacity. The empirical base was formed by data from a formalized survey conducted in 2025 among residents of Perm city (n = 582). The data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics software. The model was built using the neural network procedure of the multilayer perceptron (MLP).

The study has found that health behavior of employable population living in Perm is characterized by a moderate risk profile. This is reflected in a moderate level of commitment to physical activity and medical practices, as well as relatively low manifestation of addictions. The factors identified in the study have a complex interrelationship. At the same time, there is a lack of an unambiguous link between health attitudes and actual implementation of consistent health-preserving behavior. Social support functions as a factor contributing to health preservation, but only with moderate intensity; its excessive manifestation can negate an individual's personal responsibility. In addition, influence of social connections has a bilateral effect: they can both provide support and contribute to formation of unhealthy behaviors through normative pressure. A high level of subjective security perception contributes to increased inclination for self-preservation behavior, while a decrease in this perception initiates the opposite process.

The study highlights complex mechanisms of interaction between factors and self-preservation behavior pointing out that practices aimed at preserving health do not always manifest themselves in a systematic and sustainable form. The results substantiate the necessity to conduct investigative search for additional components forming the structure of self-preservation behavior in addition to behavioral practices. Preventive approaches to reducing risky behavior among employable population should take into account specific factors, which determine this behavior in various social groups, and adapt to their specific needs.

Keywords: 
risky behavior, self-preservation behavior, health, employable population, multifactorial causation, neural network modeling
Gordeeva S.S., Sharypova S.Yu., Shlyapina A.S. Factors of self-preservation and risky behavior of employable population in an industrial megalopolis. Health Risk Analysis, 2025, no. 2, pp. 60–72. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2025.2.05.eng
References: 
  1. Staykova A.P., Titopoulou M. Study on the Behavioral Health Risk Factors of Sewing Industry Workers in Bulgaria. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 2017, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 200–211. DOI: 10.26417/ejes.v8i1.p200-211
  2. Park J., Kim Y. From Workers to the Working-Age Population: A New Paradigm for the Occupational Health Service. Saf. Health Work, 2019, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 251–253. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.07.002
  3. Vasilieva T.P., Larionov A.V. A Conceptual Approach to Managing the Behavioral Determinant of Public Health. ZNiSO, 2025, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 7–17. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/202533-1-7-17 (in Russian).
  4. Kleyn S.V., Onishchenko G.G., Zaitseva N.V., Glukhikh М.V. Life expectancy at birth in rf regions with diriment sanitary-epidemiological wellbeing and different lifestyles. management reserves. Health Risk Analysis, 2022, no. 4, pp. 18–32. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2022.4.02.eng
  5. Zubok Yu.A., Prokazina N.V. The attitude of young people to the new coronavirus infection: the dynamics of ideas and practices of health-saving behavior. Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2021, vol. 29, no. s1, pp. 752–757. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-s1-752-757 (in Russian).
  6. Ryazanova E.А. To the problem of typology of the riskogenic behaviour (analysis on the example of an industrial en-terprise of Perm region). Health Risk Analysis, 2016, no. 2, pp. 68–75. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2016.2.08.eng
  7. Kislitsyna O.A. Social inequality in the health status of Russians: the role of material, psychosocial and behavioral fac-tors. Sotsial'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya, 2023, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 7. DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2023-69-3-7 (in Russian).
  8. Korolenko А.V. Patterns of population’s self-preservation behavior: research approaches and building experience. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 248–263. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.3.57.16
  9. Kovaleva A.A. Samosokhranitel'noe povedenie v sisteme faktorov, okazyvayushchikh vliyanie na sostoyanie zdorov'ya [Self-preservation behavior in the system of factors influencing health]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii, 2008, vol. XI, no. 2, pp. 179–191 (in Russian).
  10. Nazarova I.B. Monitoring of the population health and health risk factors (research methodology). Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya, 2022, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 616–629. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-3-616-629 (in Russian).
  11. Rostovskaya T.K., Ivanova A.K., Kniazkova E.A. The practice of self-preserving behavior of the citizen of the Russian Federation: the results of the All-Russian sociological study “The demographic self-feeling of Russia”. Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2021, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 66–75. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-1-66-75 (in Russian).
  12. Yanitsky O. The reasons and consequences of modern war: a sociological view. Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015, 172 p. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=3298 (April 29, 2025) (in Russian).
  13. Bush J., White M., Kai J., Rankin J., Bhopa R. Understanding influences on smoking in Bangladeshi and Pakistani adults: community based, qualitative study. BMJ, 2003, vol. 326, no. 7396, pp. 962. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.962
  14. Barakhoeva R.B. Factors Influencing the Level of Formation of Self-Preservation Behaviour. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel'skii zhurnal, 2023, no. 12 (138). DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2023.138.67 (in Russian).
  15. Danilova A.A., Zabelina E.V., Telitsyna A.Y., Chestyunina Y.V. Factors of Subjective Health: Structural Model in the Period of Late Socialization. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny, 2023, no. 6, pp. 144–170. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2023.6.2399 (in Russian).
  16. Vangorodskaya S.A. The factors of self-preservation behavior of the population in the region (based on empirical studies). Nauchnyi rezul'tat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie, 2018, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 13–26. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-2-0-2 (in Russian).
  17. Ryu H., Moon J., Jung J. Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Risk by Socioeconomic Status (SES) of Workers Using National Health Information Database. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2047. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062047
  18. Helgesson M., Marklund S., Gustafsson K., Aronsson G., Leineweber C. Favorable Working Conditions Related to Health Behavior Among Nurses and Care Assistants in Sweden – A Population-Based Cohort Study. Front. Public Health, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 681971. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.681971
  19. Bagisheva N.V., Mordyk A.V., Nesterova K.I., Goltyapin V.V., Aroyan A.R., Rudenko S.A., Shirinskaya N.V. Factor analysis of socio-demographic preconditions for tuberculosis development in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7–15. DOI: 10.20969/VSKM.2021.14(1).7-15 (in Russian).
  20. Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V. Health in the Perception of Russians and Real Medical Practices. ZNiSO, 2021, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 19–27. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/2021-29-7-19-27 (in Russian).
  21. Basova E. Regional Inequality in the Context of the Availability of Socially Significant Benefits: Comparative As-sessment. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 2022, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 83–98. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-1-83-98 (in Russian).
  22. Ryazantsev S.V., Khramova M.N., Smirnov A.V. The social demographic aspects of vaccination of population of Russia in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2021, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1047–1056. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-5-1047-1056 (in Russian).
  23. Cook W.K., Libo L., Tam C.C., Mulia N., Kerr W.C. Associations of clustered health risk behaviors with diabetes and hypertension in White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American adults. BMC Public Health, 2022, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 773 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12938-y
  24. Zaitseva N.V., Alekseev V.B., May I.V., Kiryanov D.A., Zemlyanova M.A., Khismatullin D.R., Peskova E.V. Problem Searching approaches to nutrition optimization to increase the potential of life expectancy taking into account bioinformatic signals of the human regulatory system. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2024, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 1494–1503. DOI: 10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-12-1494-1503 (in Russian).
  25. Kozina I.M., Serezhkina E.V. Measuring Psychosocial Risks and Quality of Work Life Among Russian Professionals. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny, 2021, no. 3, pp. 21–40. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.3.1891 (in Russian).
  26. Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V. Differences in Behavioral Practices of Health Maintenance and Promotion between Knowledge and Manual Workers. ZNiSO, 2022, no. 9, pp. 18–28. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/2022-30-9-18-28 (in Russian).
  27. Wang Y., Wen X., Zhu Y., Xiong Y., Liu X. Chinese Residents’ Healthy Eating Intentions and Behaviors: Based on an Extended Health Belief Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 9037. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159037
  28. Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V. Food Culture of the Russian Population: Results of a Sociological Survey. ZNiSO, 2022, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 13–22. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/2022-30-2-13-22 (in Russian).
  29. Huang H.-T., Kuo Y.-M., Wang S.-R., Wang C.-F., Tsai C.-H. Structural Factors Affecting Health Examination Behavioral Intention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2016, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 395. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13040395
  30. Haidar A., Ranjit N., Archer N.P., Hoelscher D.M. Parental and peer social support is associated with healthier physical activity behaviors in adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis of Texas School Physical Activity and Nutrition (TX SPAN) data. BMC Public Health, 2019, vol. 19, pp. 640. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7001-0
  31. Tabak R.G., Hipp J.A., Marx C.M., Brownson R.C. Workplace Social and Organizational Environments and Healthy-Weight Behaviors. PLoS One, 2015, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. e0125424. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125424
  32. Malekpour F., Moeini B., Tapak L., Sadeghi-Bazargani H., Rezapur-Shahkolai F. Prediction of Seat Belt Use Behavior among Adolescents Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Res. Health Sci., 2021, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. e00536. DOI: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.71
  33. Popova L.А., Milaeva Т.V., Zorina Е.N. Self-preservation behavior: generational aspect. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 261–276. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.15
  34. Lokosov V.V., Yarasheva A.V., Aleksandrova O.A. Factors forming the foundations for self-preservation behavior of the population. Narodonaselenie, 2024, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 192–205. DOI: 10.24412/1561-7785-2024-1-192-205 (in Russian).
  35. Brügger A., Höchli B. The Role of Attitude Strength in Behavioral Spillover: Attitude Matters – But Not Necessarily as a Moderator. Front. Psychol., 2019, vol. 10, pp. 1018. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01018
  36. Shlykova E.V. Otnoshenie k risku kak differentsiruyushchii faktor vybora sposoba vynuzhdennoi adaptatsii [Attitude to risk as a differentiating factor in selecting a method of forced adaptation]. Sputnik ezhegodnika «Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya», 2016, iss. 2, pp. 1–15 (in Russian).
  37. Lakon C.M., Zheng Y., Pechmann C. Social network tie functions of social support and social influence and adult smoking abstinence. PLoS One, 2024, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. e0296458. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296458
  38. Kawachi I., Adler N.E., Dow W.H. Money, schooling, and health: Mechanisms and causal evidence. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci., 2010, vol. 1186, pp. 56–68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05340.x
  39. Kraft P., Kraft B., Hagen T., Espeseth T. Subjective Socioeconomic Status, Cognitive Abilities, and Personal Control: Associations With Health Behaviours. Front. Psychol., 2022, vol. 12, pp. 784758. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784758
  40. Galkina E.P., Kadnichanskaya M.I., Vlasova N.V. Typology of self-preservation behavior of the population in a pan-demic. Logos et Praxis, 2022, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 144–155. DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2022.3.15 (in Russian).
  41. Aksenova E.I., Kamynina N.N., Turzin P.S. Urban stress of a megalopolis resident: stress factors and correction. Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2023, no. 31 (s2), pp. 1087–1091. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2023-31-s2-1087-1091 (in Russian).
  42. Zaitseva N.V., Kostarev V.G., Kleyn S.V., Glukhikh M.V., Kiryanov D.A. Reserves and limitations of the gain in life expectancy at birth for people in an industrially developed region associated with losses due to circulatory diseases. Zdravo-okhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2024, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 480–487. DOI: 10.47470/0044-197X-2024-68-6-480-487 (in Russian).
Received: 
10.03.2025
Approved: 
06.05.2025
Accepted for publication: 
14.06.2025

You are here