Individual strategies for mitigating health risk under high epidemiological hazard (review of foreign studies)

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2023-3-18.pdf
UDC: 
316.62::616.9;614.4
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.18.eng
Authors: 

S.А. Sudin

Organization: 

Perm State University, 15 Bukireva St., Perm, 614990, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

The COVID-19 pandemic created elevated risks for life and health of overwhelming majority of people all over the world. The situation called for global restructuring of activities performed by social institutions as well as for adaptation of people’s routine behaviors to this new reality. Common people faced a serious challenge of selecting an optimal self-preservation model that would allow achieving the maximum possible mitigation of health risks. This review covers empirical foreign studies with their focus on people’s health-related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic with its aim being to identify different types of individual strategies for health risk mitigation.
During the pandemic, protective behavior was influenced by social, cultural, sociodemographic, and individual and personality-related factors. Effects of micro-factors (age or education) could be different depending on a country. High healthcare literacy was a factor of selecting a protective behavior model regardless of any other characteristics.

We can spot out three basic strategies for mitigating health risks under high epidemiological hazard: 1) a maximum protection strategy involving adherence to most medical recommendations on prevention of the coronavirus infection;
2) a dominating protection strategy that involves adherence to some basic recommendations (face mask wearing, frequent hand washing, and self-isolation); 3) a mixed strategy that includes periodical adherence to some recommendation on prevention of the infection, on the one hand, and some risky behaviors, on the other hand.

Behavior strategies aimed at mental health protection are various and include, for example, those that are oriented at social networks as much as only possible (a strategy involving search for emotional support or an attempt to keep social contacts), as well as isolation strategies and deviant strategies.

Some studies covered in the review suggest ways to consider peculiarities of individual and family behavior during the pandemics when solving tasks related to risks of infections spread in future.

Keywords: 
pandemic, health risks, self-protective behavior, health-related behavior, coronavirus infection, risk mitigation strategies, maximum protection strategy, dominating protection strategy
Sudin S.А. Individual strategies for mitigating health risk under high epidemiological hazard (review of foreign studies). Health Risk Analysis, 2023, no. 3, pp. 166–178. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.18.eng
References: 
  1. Feehan J., Apostolopoulos V. Is COVID-19 the worst pandemic? Maturitas, 2021, vol. 149, pp. 56–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.02.001
  2. Bickley S.J., Chan H.F., Skali A., Stadelmann D., Torgler B. How does globalization affect COVID-19 responses? Global. Health, 2021, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 57. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00677-5
  3. Karlinsky A., Kobak D. Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic with the World Mortality Dataset. eLife, 2021, vol. 10, pp. e69336. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.69336
  4. Bottan N., Hoffmann B., Vera-Cossio D. The unequal impact of the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from seventeen developing countries. PLoS One, 2020, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. e0239797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239797
  5. Gęca T., Wojtowicz K., Guzik P., Góra T. Increased risk of COVID-19 in patients with diabetes mellitus-current chal-lenges in pathophysiology, treatment and orevention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 6555. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116555
  6. Drucker D.J. Diabetes, obesity, metabolism, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: the end of the beginning. Cell Metab., 2021, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 479–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.01.016
  7. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, vol. 50, pp. 179–211.
  8. O'Sullivan R., Burns A., Leavey G., Leroi I., Burholt V., Lubben J., Holt-Lunstad J., C Victor. [et al.]. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on loneliness and social isolation: a multi-country study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2021, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 9982. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18199982
  9. Aschwanden D., Strickhouser J.E., Sesker A.A., Lee J.H., Luchetti M., Terracciano A., Sutin A.R. Preventive behav-iors during the COVID-19 pandemic: associations with perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and subjective norm. Front. Public Health, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 662835. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.662835
  10. Wachira E., Laki K., Chavan B., Aidoo-Frimpong G., Kingori C. Factors influencing COVID-19 prevention behaviors. J. Prev., 2023, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 35–52. DOI: 10.1007/s10935-022-00719-7
  11. Lages N.C., Villinger K., Koller J.E., Brünecke I., Debbeler J.M., Engel K.D., Grieble S., Homann P.C. [et al.]. The relation of threat level and age with protective behavior intentions during Covid-19 in Germany. Health Educ. Behav., 2021, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 118–122. DOI: 10.1177/1090198121989960
  12. Vasilopoulos A., Pantelidaki N.A., Tzoura A., Papadopoulou D., Stilliani K., Paralikas T., Kortianou E., Mastrogiannis D. Factors underlying denial of and disbelief in COVID-19. J. Bras. Pneumol., 2022, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. e20220228. DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220228
  13. Dev R., Raparelli V., Bacon S.L., Lavoie K.L., Pilote L., Norris C.M., iCARE Study Team. Impact of biological sex and gender-related factors on public engagement in protective health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analyses from a global survey. BMJ Open, 2022, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. e059673. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059673
  14. Li F., Liang W., Rhodes R.E., Duan Y., Wang X., Shang B., Yang Y., Jiao J. [et al.]. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the preventive behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic among children and adolescents. BMC Public Health, 2022, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1201. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13585-z
  15. Otterbring T., Festila A. Pandemic prevention and personality psychology: Gender differences in preventive health behaviors during COVID-19 and the roles of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 2022, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.11.003
  16. Schaedel L., Dadaczynski K. Präventive Verhaltensweisen zum Schutz vor einer Infektion mit SARS-CoV-2 bei Menschen mit gesundheitlicher Vulnerabilität [Preventive behaviors to protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection among people with health vulnerability]. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11553-022-00989-3 (in German).
  17. Betsch C., Wieler L., Bosnjak M., Ramharter M., Stollorz V., Omer S., Korn L., Sprengholz P. [et al.]. Germany COVID-19 snapshot monitoring (COSMO Germany): monitoring knowledge, risk perceptions, preventive behaviours and public trust in the current Coronavirus outbreak in Germany. PsychArchives, 2020. DOI: 10.23668/psycharchives.2776
  18. Šuriņa S., Martinsone K., Perepjolkina V., Kolesnikova J., Vainik U., Ruža A., Vrublevska J., Smirnova D. [et al.]. Factors Related to COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors: A Structural Equation Model. Front. Psychol., 2021, vol. 12, pp. 676521. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676521
  19. Jørgensen F., Bor A., Petersen M.B. Compliance without fear: Individual-level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Br. J. Health Psychol., 2021, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 679–696. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12519
  20. Banerjee S., Koner S., Sharma D., Gupta S. The impact of literacy on COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical analysis on India. J. Asian Afr. Stud., 2023, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/00219096231171540
  21. Lau S.S.S., Shum E.N.Y., Man J.O.T., Cheung E.T.H., Amoah P.A., Leung A.Y.M., Dadaczynski K., Okan O. As-sessing COVID-19-related health literacy and associated factors among school teachers in Hong Kong, China. Front. Public Health, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 1057782. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1057782
  22. Okan O., Bollweg T.M., Berens E.M., Hurrelmann K., Bauer U., Schaeffer D. Coronavirus-related health literacy: a cross-sectional study in adults during the COVID-19 infodemic in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 5503. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155503
  23. Okan O., de Sombre S., Hurrelmann K., Berens E.-M., Bauer U., Schaeffer D. Gesundheitskompetenz der Bevölkerung im Umgang mit der Coronavirus-Pandemie. Monitor Versorgungsforschung, 2020, vol. 3, pp. 38–44. DOI: 10.24945/MVF.03.20.1866-0533.2222 (in German).
  24. Liu H., Liu W., Yoganathan V., Osburg, V.-S. COVID-19 information overload and generation Z's social media dis-continuance intention during the pandemic lockdown. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2021, vol. 166, pp. 120600. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120600
  25. McCrae R.R., John O.P. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Pers., 1992, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 175–215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
  26. John O.P., Naumann L.P., Soto C.J. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In book: Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 3rd ed. In: O.P. John, R.W. Robins, L.A. Pervin eds. New York, Guilford Press, 2008, pp. 114–158.
  27. Hu Y., Lü W. Meaning in life and health behavior habits during the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating role of health values and moderating role of conscientiousness. Curr. Psychol., 2022, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-04020-y
  28. Horwood S., Anglim J., Bereznicki H., Wood J.K. Well‐being during the coronavirus pandemic: The effect of big five personality and COVID‐19 beliefs and behaviors. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2023, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. e12744. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12744
  29. Ikizer G., Kowal M., Aldemir I.D., Jeftić A., Memisoglu-Sanli A., Najmussaqib A., Lacko D., Eichel K. [et al.]. Big Five traits predict stress and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for the role of neuroticism. Pers. Individ. Dif., 2022, vol. 190, pp. 111531. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111531
  30. Aschwanden D., Strickhouser J.E., Sesker A.A., Lee J.H., Luchetti M., Stephan Y., Sutin A.R., Terracciano A. Psy-chological and Behavioural Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Role of Personality. Eur. J. Pers., 2020, vol. 35, no. 1. DOI: 10.1002/per.2281
  31. Stockman J.K., Wood B.A., Anderson K.M. Racial and Ethnic Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes, Stressors, Fear, and Prevention Behaviors Among US Women: Web-Based Cross-sectional Study. J. Med. Internet Res., 2021, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. e26296. DOI: 10.2196/26296
  32. Yang C., Gao H., Li Y., Wang E., Wang N., Wang Q. Analyzing the role of family support, coping strategies and social support in improving the mental health of students: Evidence from post COVID-19. Front. Psychol., 2022, vol. 13, pp. 1064898. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1064898
  33. Chilon-Huaman A.M., Camposano-Ninahuanca Á., Chávez-Sosa J.V., Huancahuire-Vega S., De Borba W. Association between family support and coping strategies of people with Covid-19: a cross-sectional study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag., 2023, vol. 16, pp. 2747–2754. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S410068
  34. Li S., Xu Q. Family support as a protective factor for attitudes toward social distancing and in preserving positive mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Health Psychol., 2022, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 858–867. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320971697
  35. Perry C.J., Bekes V., Starrs C.J. A systematic survey of adults' health-protective behavior use during early COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Germany, United Kingdom, and the United States, and vaccination hesitancy and status eight months later. Prev. Med. Rep., 2022, vol. 30, pp. 102013. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102013
  36. Shapiro O., Gannot R.N., Green G., Zigdon A., Zwilling M., Giladi A., Ben-Meir L., Adilson M. [et al.]. Risk behav-iors, family support, and emotional health among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 3850. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073850
  37. Cassinat J.R., Whiteman S.D., Serang S., Dotterer A.M., Mustillo S.A., Maggs J.L., Kelly B.C. Changes in family chaos and family relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Dev. Psychol., 2021, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1597–1610. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001217
  38. Hensley S., Harris V.W. Impacts of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Families: A Family Systems Perspective. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2022, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 230–238. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.97.12679
  39. Mathur M., Robiolio H., Ebert L., Kerr B. Family stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open, 2023, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. e061396. DOI: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-061396
  40. Ehrentreich S., Metzner L., Deraneck S., Blavutskaya Z., Tschupke S., Hasseler M. Einflüsse der Coronapandemie auf gesundheitsbezogene Verhaltensweisen und Belastungen von Studierenden [Influences of the Corona pandemic on health-related behaviors and stresses of students. A survey at the Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences]. Prävention und Gesund-heitsförderung, 2022, vol. 17, pp. 364–369. DOI: 10.1007/s11553-021-00893-2 (in German).
  41. Usher K., Bradbury Jones C., Bhullar N., Durkin D.J., Gyamfi N., Fatema S.R., Jackson D. COVID-19 and family vi-olence: Is this a perfect storm? Int. J. Mental Health Nurs., 2022, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1022–1032. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12876
  42. Browne D.T., Wade M., May S.S., Jenkins J.M., Prime H. COVID-19 disruption gets inside the family: A two-month multilevel study of family stress during the pandemic. Dev. Psychol., 2021, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1681–1692. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001237
  43. Skoda E.-M., Spura A., De Bock F., Schweda A., Dörrie N., Fink M., Musche V., Weismüller B. [et al.]. Veränderung der psychischen Belastung in der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland: Ängste, individuelles Verhalten und die Relevanz von Information sowie Vertrauen in Behörden [Change in psychological burden during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: fears, individual behavior, and the relevance of information and trust in governmental institutions]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesund-heitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 2021, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 322–333. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03278-0 (in German).
  44. Ettman C.K., Abdalla S.M., Cohen G.H., Sampson L., Vivier P.M., Galea S. Prevalence of depression symptoms in us adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA, 2020, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. e2019686. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19686
  45. Luo W., Zhong B.L., Chiu H.F. Prevalence of depressive symptoms among Chinese university students amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci., 2021, vol. 30, pp. e31. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796021000202
  46. Giuntella O., Hyde K., Saccardo S., Sadoff S. Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 2021, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. e2016632118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016632118
  47. DeDonno M.A., Ferris A.H., Molnar A., Haire H.M., Sule S.S., Hennekens C.H., Wood S.K. Perceptions, coping strategies, and mental health of residents during COVID-19. South Med. J., 2022, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 717–721. DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001439
  48. Budimir S., Probst T., Pieh C. Coping strategies and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown. J. Ment. Health, 2021, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 156–163. DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1875412
  49. Fluharty M., Bu F., Steptoe A., Fancourt D. Coping strategies and mental health trajectories during the first 21 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom. Soc. Sci. Med., 2021, vol. 279, pp. 113958. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113958
  50. Schmidt-Petri C., Schröder C., Okubo T., Graeber D., Rieger T. Social norms and preventive behaviors in Japan and Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Public Health, 2022, vol. 10, pp. 842177. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842177
  51. Niu Z., Wang T., Hu P., Mei J., Tang Z. Chinese public's engagement in preventive and intervening health behaviors during the early breakout of COVID-19: cross-sectional study. J. Med. Internet Res., 2020, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. e19995. DOI: 10.2196/19995
  52. Perrotta D., Grow A., Rampazzo F., Cimentada J., Del Fava E., Gil-Clavel S., Zagheni E. Behaviours and attitudes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a cross-national Facebook survey. EPJ Data Sci., 2021, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17. DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00270-1
  53. Yamamura E., Kosaka Y., Tsutsui Y., Ohtake F. Effect of the COVID-19 vaccine on preventive behaviors: Panel data analysis from Japan. Vaccines, 2023, vol. 11, pp. 810. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1625548/v1
  54. Nishimi K., Borsari B., Marx B.P., Rosen R.C., Cohen B.E., Woodward E., Maven D., Tripp P. [et al.]. Clusters of COVID-19 protective and risky behaviors and their associations with pandemic, socio-demographic, and mental health factors in the United States. Prev. Med. Rep., 2022, vol. 25, pp. 101671. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101671
  55. Thagard P. The cognitive science of COVID-19: Acceptance, denial, and belief change. Methods, 2021, vol. 195, pp. 92–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.03.009
Received: 
30.08.2023
Approved: 
18.09.2023
Accepted for publication: 
25.09.2023

You are here

Home