Developing model of risk-based sanitary-epidemiological control (surveillance) over food products in consumer market

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2023-3-1.pdf
UDC: 
614.3; 658.562.6
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.01.eng
Authors: 

N.V. Zaitseva, I.V. May, N.V. Nikiforova, D.А. Kiryanov

Organization: 

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, 82 Monastyrskaya St., Perm, 614045, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

The relevance of this study arises from products being fixed as an independent object for state sanitary-epidemiological control in law.
The contemporary stage of the public regulation involves the following: administrative pressure on economic entities ought to be easer but the best possible protection of citizens’ life and health should be provided.

In this study, our aim was to test approaches to developing the risk-based model for control of food products on the consumer market in the country.

The study relied on using the fundamental methodical approaches to the risk-based control model used by the Sanitary Service of Russia.

A potential health risk was determined as a combination of likely violations of legal requirements to a certain product, severity of health outcomes due to such violations, and coefficients that described a scale of undesirable consequences.

Food products were assigned into one of the following categories as per health risks: objects of extremely high risk, high risk, considerable risk, moderate risk, medium risk, or low risk.

We suggest a fundamental scheme describing how to organize risk-based control of food products as an independent control object. It includes several basic elements, namely, creating a register of consumer food products; identifying priority groups of food products as per risk criteria at the federal level; identifying regional priorities. We provide substantiation for advisability of profound risk assessment performed for food products in each group considering specific frequency of sanitary violations, scales in which a certain food product in consumed in different regions, and priority consumer demands.

Our suggestion is to integrate risk profiles of products and risk-based laboratory support for control into the general model.
We’d like to highlight the relevance of creating a unified database to keep the results of all the control and surveillance activities including data obtained by laboratory tests of products bound to manufacturers, distributors, and sellers. It is also quite relevant to include algorithms and mathematical methods of science-intensive analysis of the data sets into software modules of the Rospotrebnadzor’s Unified Information System.

Keywords: 
food products, control, safety, risk-based model, risk profile, register of products, violations of mandatory requirements, laboratory control optimization
Zaitseva N.V., May I.V., Nikiforova N.V., Kiryanov D.А. Developing model of risk-based sanitary-epidemiological control (surveillance) over food products in consumer market. Health Risk Analysis, 2023, no. 3, pp. 4–16. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.01.eng
References: 
  1. Baranovskaya M.A., Tutarishheva S.M., Ceeva S.K. On the importance of the application of HACCP in the sphere of food products. Colloquium-journal, 2019, no. 24–10 (48), pp. 82–84. DOI: 10.24411/2520-6990-2019-10870 (in Russian).
  2. Rosak-Szyrocka J., Abbase A.A. Quality management and safety of food in HACCP system aspect. Production Engi-neering Archives, 2020, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 50–53. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.11
  3. Kho J.S., Jeong J. HACCP-based cooperative model for smart factory in South Korea. Procedia Comput. Sci., 2020, vol. 175, pp. 778–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.116
  4. Zamyatin A.N., Miguel A.A., Chausov N.Yu. Development of a quality management system and safety of dairy products on the basis of HACCP principles. Russian Economic Bulletin, 2020, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 103–107 (in Russian).
  5. Terekhova O.P., Terekhov R.I., Filippov Z.S., Filippova O.A. HACCP as the main mechanism of building quality management system at the enterprise. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo, 2022, no. 4 (141), pp. 710–714. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2022.141.4.127 (in Russian).
  6. Ismailov B., Khamrakulov G. Efficiency of HACCP system application in wine-making. Universum: tekhnicheskie nauki, 2022, no. 2 (95). Available at: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/13062 (August 26, 2023) (in Russian).
  7. Dearfield K.L., Hoelzer K., Kause J.R. Review of various approaches for assessing public health risks in regulatory decision making: Choosing the right approach for the problem. J. Food Prot., 2014, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1428–1440. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-046
  8. Popova A.Yu., Zaitseva N.V., May I.V., Kiryanov D.А., Sboev A.S. Research and methodology approaches to the classification of economic units by public health harm risk for scheduling control and supervisory events. Health Risk Analysis, 2014, no. 4, pp. 4–13.
  9. Popova A.Yu. Risk analysis as a strategic sphere in providing food products safety. Health Risk Analysis, 2018, no. 4, pp. 4–12. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2018.4.01.eng
  10. Belova L.V., Kartsev V.V., Pilkova T.Yu., Novikova Yu.A. Population health risk evaluation to the influence of factors of microbial nature in production and consumption of some types of unsterilized fish products. Profilaktich-eskaya i klinicheskaya meditsina, 2014, no. 3 (52), pp. 38–43 (in Russian).
  11. Kolnet I.V., Klepikov A.O. K voprosu realizatsii programmnogo modulya «Cotsial'no-gigienicheskii monitoring» edinoi informatsionnoi avtomatizirovannoi sistemy Rospotrebnadzora [On the issue of implementing the software module “Social and Hygienic Monitoring” of the Unified Information Automated System of Rospotrebnadzor]. Gigienicheskie, epidemiologicheskie i ekologicheskie aspekty profilaktiki zabolevaemosti na regional'nom urovne: sbornik trudov konferentsii. Voronezh, 2023, pp. 19–21 (in Russian).
  12. Popova A.Yu., Zaitseva N.V., May I.V., Kiryanov D.A., Kolesnik P.A. Distant control of sanitary legislation compli-ance: goals, objectives, prospects for implementation. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2021, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1024–1034. DOI: 10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-10-1024-1034 (in Russian).
  13. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, preva-lence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet, 2017, vol. 390, no. 10100, pp. 1211–1259. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2
  14. Salomon J.A., Haagsma J.A., Davis A., de Noordhout C.M., Polinder S., Havelaar A.H., Cassini A., Devleesschauwer B. [et al.]. Disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. Lancet Glob. Health, 2015, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. e712–e723. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00069-8
  15. Zaitseva N.V., Kiryanov D.A., Tsinker M.Yu., Babina S.V. The methodological approaches to classification of diseases of blood circulation system according to severity degree based on statistic data of population appealing for medical care. Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2021, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 871–876. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-4-871-876 (in Russian).
  16. Obzor NielsenIQ: rynok molochnoi produktsii [NielsenIQ Review: Milk Products Market]. NIQ. Available at: https://nielseniq.com/global/ru/insights/analysis/2019/obzor-nielsen-ryn... (August 30, 2023) (in Russian).
  17. Kleshchina Yu.V., Eliseev Yu.Yu. Monitoring for contamination of food commodities and food products with toxic elements. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2013, no. 1, pp. 1024–1034 (in Russian).
  18. Makarov D.A., Komarov A.A., Selimov R.N. Obespechenie khimicheskoi bezopasnosti pishchevoi produktsii v Ros-siiskoi Federatsii [Ensuring chemical safety of food products in the Russian Federation]. Kontrol' kachestva produktsii, 2017, no. 5, pp. 21–26 (in Russian).
  19. Shaevich A.B. Kontrol' (nadzor) v sfere tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya: vzglyad na situatsiyu [Control (surveillance) within technical regulation: overview of the situation]. Metody otsenki sootvetstviya, 2008, no. 1, pp. 13 (in Russian).
  20. May I.V., Nikiforova N.V. Methodological approaches to optimization of the laboratory control over product safety within risk-based surveillance framework. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2019, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 205–213. DOI: 10.18821/0016-9900-2019-98-2-205-213 (in Russian).
  21. Protecting resources, promoting value: a doctor’s guide to cutting waste in clinical care. AMRC, 2014, 62 p. Available at: https://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Protecting_Resources... (August 27, 2023).
  22. Zanabria R., Racicot M., Cormier M., Arsenault J., Ferrouillet C., Letellier A., Tiwari A., Maskay A. [et al.]. Selection of risk factors to be included in the Canadian Food Inspection Agency risk assessment inspection model for food establishments. Food Microbiol., 2018, vol. 75, pp. 72–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.09.019
  23. Pielaat A., Chardon J.E., Wijnands L.M., Evers E.G. A risk based sampling design including exposure assessment linked to disease burden, uncertainty and costs. Food Control, 2018, no. 84, pp. 23–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.07.014
Received: 
03.08.2023
Approved: 
22.09.2023
Accepted for publication: 
25.09.2023

You are here

Home