Hygienic aspects of anti COVID-19 measures

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2023-1-16.pdf
UDC: 
614.442: 578.834.1
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.16.eng
Authors: 

T.S. Isiutina-Fedotkova, Y.V. Zhernov, V.V. Makarova, D.V. Shcherbakov, N.N. Zabroda, N.A. Ermakova, V.A. Sukhov, A.A. Klimova, D.A. Kraskevich

Organization: 

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8 Trubetskaya Str., bldg 2, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

The aim of this analytical review was to hygienically assess non-specific prevention of the COVID-19 infection. Such measures have been examined profoundly both by Russian and foreign researchers all over the world. The pandemic of this new coronavirus infection has shown that sanitary and preventive measures are among the most significant components in fighting against it, along with anti-epidemic activities and treatment measures, development of new vaccines and medications. All over the world, many countries introduce several sanitary-epidemiological and social measures to prevent spreading of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.

The review dwells on the results obtained by investigating effectiveness of non-specific prevention of the new coronavirus infection in different countries. As illustrated in the review, it was important to introduce restrictive measures with their major aim being to prevent (or limit) the infection transmission by airborne droplets or through household contacts. Researchers performed hygienic assessment of personal protective equipment used for protection of respiratory organs and hand skin and developed recommendations on its safe and effective use and utilization.

Self-isolation as a restrictive measure to prevent the COVID-19 pandemic from spreading was a temporary one. Nevertheless, during the pandemic peak billions of people all over the world had to remain at home after the strict self-isolation had been introduced. The review provides some data on estimating the level of commitment among population to follow recommendations on limiting the infection spread in Russia and abroad. In Russia, there is a reliable and effective state infra-structure of public healthcare. It made it possible to keep the pandemic situation under control starting from the early days when cases of pneumonia with unspecified etiology were reported in December 2019 and the first COVID-19 cases were registered in the country. Several measures were introduced including administrative, organizational, technical and sanitary-hygienic ones. However, it was a challenging task to create a relevant response to the COVID-19 pandemic that the public healthcare system in Russia had to tackle.

Keywords: 
COVID-19, pandemic, public health, non-specific prevention, risk assessment, face masks, gloves, social distancing, self-isolation
Isiutina-Fedotkova T.S., Zhernov Y.V., Makarova V.V., Shcherbakov D.V., Zabroda N.N., Ermakova N.A., Sukhov V.A., Klimova A.A., Kraskevich D.A. Hygienic aspects of anti COVID-19 measures. Health Risk Analysis, 2023, no. 1, pp. 171–183. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.16.eng
References: 
  1. Tammes P. Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study. BJGP Open, 2020, vol. 4, no. 3. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101116
  2. Yaseri M., Soleimani-Jelodar R., Rostami Z., Shahsavari S., Hosseini M. Is Social Distancing Policy Effective in Controlling COVID-19? An Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med., 2021, vol. 9, no. 1, рр. e41. DOI: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1201
  3. Mitrokhin O.V., Ermakova N.A., Belova E.V. Theoretical grounds for assessing health risks factors caused by selfiso-lation. Health Risk Analysis, 2021, vol. 1, pp. 143–150. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2021.1.15.eng
  4. Zeng N., Li Z., Ng S., Chen D., Zhou H. Epidemiology reveals mask wearing by the public is crucial for COVID-19 control. Medicine in Microecology, 2020, vol. 4, pp. 100015. DOI: 10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100015
  5. Jones N.R., Qureshi Z.U., Temple R.J., Larwood J.P.J., Greenhalgh T., Bourouiba L. Two metres or one: what is the evidence for physical distancing in Сovid-19? BMJ, 2020, vol. 370, pp. m3223. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3223
  6. Chu D.K., Akl E.A., Duda S., Solo K., Yaacoub S., Schünemann H.J., COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 2020, vol. 395, no. 10242, pp. 1973–1987. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
  7. Ng O.T., Marimuthu K., Koh V., Pang J., Linn K.Z., Sun J., De Wang L., Chia W.N. [et al.]. SARS-CoV-2 seropreva-lence and transmission risk factors among high-risk close contacts: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis., 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 333–343. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30833-1
  8. Harweg T., Bachmann D., Weichert F. Agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics for exposure time estimation in epidemic risk assessment. Z. Gesundh. Wiss., 2021, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01489-y
  9. Rowe B.R., Canosa A., Meslem A., Rowe F. Increased airborne transmission of COVID-19 with new variants, impli-cations for health policies. Building and Environment, 2022, vol. 219, pp. 109132. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109132
  10. Abbas B., Abbas S., Saleem I., Asghar S., Gulfam F., Umair M. Risk Stratification Tool to Develop Framework for Infection Control in Spectrum of Dental Procedures during COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, 2022, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55–59. DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.2.184
  11. Li P., Chen X., Ma C., Zhu C., Lu W. Risk assessment of COVID-19 infection for subway commuters integrating dynamic changes in passenger numbers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2022, vol. 29, no. 49, pp. 74715–74724. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20920-9
  12. Alaluf M.G., Pasqualini A., Fiszbajn G., Botti G., Estofan G., Ruhlmann C., Solari L., Bisioli C. [et al.]. COVID-19 risk assessment and safety management operational guidelines for IVF center reopening. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 2020, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2669–2686. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01958-5
  13. Tasic-Kostov M., Martinović M., Ilic D., Cvetkovic M. Cotton versus medical facemask influence on skin characteristics during COVID-19 pandemic: A short-term study. Skin Res. Technol., 2022, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 66–70. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13091
  14. Park S.-R., Han J., Yeon Y.M., Kang N.Y., Kim E., Suh B.-F. Long-term effects of face masks on skin characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Skin Res. Technol., 2022, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 153–161. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13107
  15. Shashina E.A., Zhernov Y.V., Belova E.V., Shcherbakov D.V., Sukhov V.A., Makarova V.V., Isiutina-Fedot¬kova T.S., Zabroda N.N., Mitrokhin O.V. Hygienic assessment of the use of masks by airport workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sanitarnyi vrach, 2022, no. 5, pp. 350–360. DOI: 10.33920/med-08-2205-05 (in Russian).
  16. Shashina E.A., Belova E.V., Gruzdeva O.A., Skopin A.Y., Andreev S.V., Zhukova A.V., Zhernov Y.V., Isiutina-Fedotkova T.S. [et al.]. Assessment of bacterial filtraiton and air permeability of face masks used by people during the Covid-19 pandemic. Health Risk Analysis, 2022, no. 1, pp. 93–100. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2022.1.09.eng
  17. Tan M., Wang Y., Luo L., Hu J. How the public used face masks in China during the coronavirus disease pandemic: A survey study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 2021, vol. 115, pp. 103853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103853
  18. Kirsch F., Lindemann A-K., Geppert J., Borzekowski D., Lohmann M., Böl G.-F. Personal Protective Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. Int. J. Infect. Dis., 2022, vol. 121, pp. 177–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.036
  19. Zhang L., Zhu S., Yao H., Li M., Si G., Tan X. Study on Factors of People’s Wearing Masks Based on Two Online Surveys: Cross-Sectional Evidence from China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2021, vol. 18, no. 7, p. 3447. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073447
  20. Shashina E.A., Smirnova T.M., Belova E.V., Zhernov Y.V., Khodykina T.M., Makarova V.V., Isiutina-Fedotkova T.S., Zabroda N.N. [et al.]. Аnalysis of adverse reactions to face mask wearing by transport workers during the СOVID-19 pandemic. Meditsina truda i ekologiya cheloveka, 2022, no. 2, pp. 19–36. DOI: 10.24412/2411-3794-2022-10202 (in Russian).
  21. Neuzorava A.B., Skirkovsky S.V. Face Masks as a Factor in Eventuality of Changes in Driving Safety. Mir transporta, 2021, vol. 19, no. 4, pp.118–125. DOI: 10.30932/1992-3252-2021-19-4-13 (in Russian).
  22. Kundu S., Al Banna M.H., Sayeed A., Begum M.R., Brazendale K., Hasan M.T., Habiba S.J., Abid M.T. [et al.]. Knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices toward the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey among Bangladeshi residents. Z. Gesundh. Wiss., 2021, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01636-5
  23. Xue X., Ball J.K., Alexander C., Alexander M.R. All Surfaces Are Not Equal in Contact Transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Matter, 2020, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1433–1441. DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.10.006
  24. Morales M.B., Ortiz-Muñoz L., Duarte Anselmi G., Rada G., COVID-19 L•OVE Working Group. Use of gloves for the prevention of COVID-19 in healthy population: A living systematic review protocol. Health Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. e255. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.255
  25. Firouzbakht M., Omidvar S., Firouzbakht S., Asadi-Amoli A. COVID-19 preventive behaviors and influencing factors in the Iranian population; a web-based survey. BMC Public Health, 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 143. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10201-4
  26. Joseph N., Singh V.P., Murthy I.V., Raman V., Banihatti Nagaraj M., Shetty R.V., Sai Vemuri K., Shreedhara S., Manja M.S.S. Practices, awareness, and perception towards home-based COVID-19 management among the general population in Mangalore city in South India. F1000Res., 2021, vol. 10, pp. 1271. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.74514.2
  27. Tabary M., Araghi F., Nasiri S., Dadkhahfar S. Dealing with skin reactions to gloves during the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 2021, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 247–248. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.212
  28. Montero-Vilchez T., Martinez-Lopez A., Cuenca-Barrales C., Rodriguez-Tejero A., Molina-Leyva A., Arias-Santiago S. Impact of Gloves and Mask Use on Epidermal Barrier Function in Health Care Workers. Dermatitis, 2021, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57–62. DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000682
  29. Belova E., Shashina E., Zhernov Y., Zabroda N., Sukhov V., Gruzdeva O., Khodykina T., Laponova E. [et al.]. Assessment of Hygiene Indicators When Using Gloves by Transport Workers in Russia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1198. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031198
  30. Mitrokhin O.V., Reshetnikov V.A., Belova E.V., Jakovljevic M. Sanitary and hygienic aspects of the COVID-19 self-isolation. Open Public Health J., 2020, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 734–738. DOI: 10.2174/1874944502013010734
  31. Faulkner J., O’Brien W.J., McGrane B., Wadsworth D., Batten J., Askew C.D., Badenhorst C., Byrd E. [et al.]. Physi-cal activity, mental health and well-being of adults during initial COVID-19 containment strategies: A multi-country cross-sectional analysis. J. Sci. Med. Sport, 2021, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 320–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.11.016
  32. Di Renzo L., Gualtieri P., Pivari F., Soldati L., Attinà A., Cinelli G., Leggeri C., Caparello G. [et al.]. Eating habits and lifestyle changes during COVID-19 lockdown: an Italian survey. J. Transl. Med., 2020, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 229. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02399-5
  33. Tutelyan V.A., Nikityuk D.B., Burlyaeva E.A., Khotimchenko S.A., Baturin A.K., Starodubova A.V., Kambarov A.O., Sheveleva S.A., Zhilinskaya N.V. COVID-19: new challenges for medical science and practical health. Voprosy pitaniya, 2020, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 6–13. DOI: 10.24411/0042-8833-2020-10024 (in Russian).
  34. Kifle Z.D., Woldeyohanins A.E., Asmare B., Atanaw B., Mesafint T., Adugna M. Assessment of lifestyle changes during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS One, 2022, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. e0264617. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0264617
  35. Antsiferova A.A., Kontsevaya A.V., Mukaneeva D.K., Ivanova E.S., Drapkina O.M. Public commitment to the im-plementation of recommendations to limit the spread of new coronavirus infection in the Russian Federation in the autumn-winter period 2020–2021. Profilakticheskaya meditsina, 2022, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 19–25. DOI: 10.17116/profmed20222502119 (in Russian).
  36. Du J., Mayer G., Hummel S., Oetjen N., Gronewold N., Zafar A., Schultz J.H. Mental Health Burden in Different Pro-fessions During the Final Stage of the COVID-19 Lockdown in China: Cross-sectional Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res., 2020, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. e24240. DOI: 10.2196/24240
  37. de Barros G.M.M., Pinto Valério F.C.E., Domingos da Silva M.H.F., Gomes Pecorelli D., da Nóbrega Porto V.U., de Avila Silva L. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of students. Research, Society and Development, 2021, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. e47210918307. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18307
  38. Capasso L., D’Alessandro D. Housing and Health: Here We Go Again. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2021, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 12060. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212060
  39. Oh J., Park H. Effects of Changes in Environmental Color Chroma on Heart Rate Variability and Stress by Gender. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2022, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5711. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095711
  40. Reshetnikov V., Mitrokhin O., Belova E., Mikhailovsky V., Mikerova M., Alsaegh A., Yakushina I., Royuk V. Indoor Environmental Quality in Dwellings and Lifestyle Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Russian Perspective. Int. J. Envi-ron. Res. Public Health, 2021, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5975. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115975
  41. Reshetnikov V., Mitrokhin O., Shepetovskaya N., Belova E., Jakovljevic M. Organizational measures aiming to combat COVID-19 in the Russian Federation: the first experience. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res., 2020, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 571–576. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1823221
  42. Mitrokhin O.V., Ermakova N.A., Akimova E.I., Sidorova E.A. COVID-19 – ways to improve the state preparedness for pandemia. Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2022, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 5–10 (in Russian).
Received: 
08.01.2023
Approved: 
08.02.2023
Accepted for publication: 
10.03.2023

You are here

Home