Ambient air quality and health risks as objective indicators to estimate effectiveness of air protection in cities included into the ‘Clean Air’ Federal project

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
614.442: 578.834.1
Authors: 

N.V. Zaitseva, I.V. May

Organization: 

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, 82 Monastyrskaya Str., Perm, 6140045, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

It is important to estimate effectiveness and results achieved by measures implemented within the ‘Clean Air’ Federal project as regards public health in cities included into it.

The aim of this study was to analyze changes in levels of ambient air pollution and airborne health risks in cities included into the ‘Clean Air’ Federal project in dynamics over 2020–2022 and to estimate whether the measures aimed at reduction of emissions were adequate to risk rates and factors.

The study relied on analyzing the results of field observations over ambient air quality within social and hygienic mon-itoring. Monitoring covered priority chemicals that made 95 % contributions to impermissible health risks according to dis-persion calculations. Risk assessment was performed as per standard algorithms and indicators. Adequacy of air protection and correctness of its orientation were estimated in Norilsk as an example city.

The study established that levels of harmful chemicals in ambient were higher than hygienic standards over the analyzed period in all the cities participating in the project. We did not detect any significant reduction in ambient air pollution; there were no positive trends in health risks rates either. In 2022, a risk of respiratory diseases under chronic exposure was ranked as high (hazard index or HI 10.5÷43) in Chelyabinsk, Mednogorsk, Norilsk, Krasnoyarsk, Lipetsk, and Chita; it was ranked as ‘alerting’ in Bratsk, Chita, Novokuznetsk, Magnitogorsk, and Omsk (HI 4.0÷5.8), A permissible risk was identified over the analyzed period only in Cherepovets (HI<3).

So far, reductions in emissions of pollutants declared by economic entities have not ensured absence of impermissible health risks in 11 out of 12 cities. Ungrounded orientation to a 20 % reduction in emissions of all the economic entities included in the experiment and failure to consider risk indicators when setting quotas for emissions can lead to absence of any substantial effects for public health in the analyzed cities. In some cases, this may even result in excessive spending on activities that do not have any significant influence on a sanitary-hygienic situation.

Keywords: 
Federal project, social and hygienic monitoring, ambient air quality, health risk, air protection, hazard index, setting quotas for emissions
Zaitseva N.V., May I.V. Ambient air quality and health risks as objective indicators to estimate effectiveness of air protection in cities included into the ‘Clean air’ Federal project. Health Risk Analysis, 2023, no. 1, pp. 4–12. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.01.eng
References: 
  1. Martsinkovskiy O.A., Dvinyanina O.V., Vas'kina A.A., Romanov A.V. Federal project “Clean Air”: a new standard of living. Standarty i kachestvo, 2022, no. 3, pp. 93–95 (in Russian).
  2. Shpakova R.N. Federal'nyi proekt «Chistyi vozdukh» kak instrument resheniya ekologicheskikh problem [‘Clean Air’ Federal project as a tool for solving environmental problems]. In book: Obzor realizatsii natsional'nykh proektov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: tselepolaganie i dostizhenie [Overview of the implementation of national projects in the Russian Federation: goal setting and achievement]; by V.I. Dobrosotskii, R.N. Shpakova, G.N. Voinikova [et al.]. Moscow, OOO «Izd-vo Magistr», 2022, pp. 25–53 (in Russian).
  3. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. Geneva, WHO, 2016. Available at: https://www.who.int/airpollution/ambient/health-impacts/en (January 21, 2023).
  4. Darbre P.D. Overview of air pollution and endocrine disorders. Int. J. Gen. Med., 2018, vol. 11, pp. 191–207. DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s102230
  5. Leshchuk S.I., Ochirzhapova D.Ts. Anthropogenic contamination of atmosphere air and its influence on population's health. Vestnik IrGSKhA, 2012, no. 51, pp. 52–61 (in Russian).
  6. Prüss-Ustün A., Wolf J., Corvalán C., Neville T., Bos R., Neira M. Diseases due to unhealthy environments: an updated estimate of the global burden of disease attributable to environmental determinants of health. J. Public Health (Oxf.), 2017, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 464–475. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw085
  7. Kolpakova A.F. On the relationship of anthropogenic air pollution by particulate matter with cancer risk. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2020, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 298–302. DOI: 10.33029/0016-9900-2020-99-3-298-302 (in Russian).
  8. Carpenter D.O., Bushkin-Bedient S. Exposure to chemicals and radiation during childhood and risk for cancer later in life. J. Adolesc. Health, 2013, vol. 52, suppl. 5, pp. S21–S29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.027
  9. Falta T., Limbeck A., Koellensperger G., Hann S. Bioaccessibility of selected trace metals in urban PM2.5 and PM10 samples: a model study. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2008, vol. 390, no. 4, pp. 1149–1157. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-007-1762-5
  10. Revich B.A. How effective is "Clean Air for health in 12 cities" project? Ekologicheskii vestnik Rossii, 2020, no. 3, pp. 58–68 (in Russian).
  11. Popova A.Yu., Zaitseva N.V., May I.V. Population health as a target function and criterion for assessing efficiency of activities performed within “Pure Air” Federal project. Health Risk Analysis, 2019, no. 4, pp. 4–13. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.01.eng
  12. Popova A.Yu. Strategic priorities of the Russian Federation in the field of ecology from the position of preservation of health of the nation. ZNiSO, 2014, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 4–7 (in Russian).
  13. Safina L.I., Sveshnikova E.S., Trubin A.A., Fadeeva M.D. Strategicheskie tseli razvitiya Rossii na blizhaishie 25–30 let [Strategic goals of Russia's development for the next 25–30 years]. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologii, 2016, no. 7–8, pp. 108–110 (in Russian).
  14. Kolin K.K. Strategic aims, priorities and problems of development of Russia for the period till 2030. In book: Strategic goal-setting in situational centers of development; by Z.K. Avdeeva, P.Yu. Baryshnikov, D.A. Zhurenkov, A.A. Zatsarinnyi, N.I. Ilin, K.K. Kolin, V.E. Lepsky, G.G. Malinetsky [et al.]. Moscow, OOO «Kogito-Tsentr», 2018, pp. 63–105 (in Russian).
  15. Andrishunas A.M., Kleyn S.V., Goryaev D.V., Balashov S.Yu., Zagorodnov S.Yu. Hygienic assessment of air protec-tion activities at heat-and-power engineering enterprises. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2022, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 1290–1298. DOI: 10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-11-1290-1298 (in Russian).
  16. Surzhikov D.V., Kislitsyna V.V., Shtaiger V.A., Golikov R.A. Experience in using statistical and mathematical tech-nologies to assess the impact of atmospheric pollution on public health in a large industrial center. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2021, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 663–667. DOI: 10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-7-663-667 (in Russian).
  17. Ganzhinova S., Krasnoperova I., Mal'tsev G., Rachev P., Rumyantsev N. Zdorov'e megapolisa. Mezhdunarodnyi renking gorodov-liderov povestki Urban Health [Metropolitan health. International ranking of leading cities on the Urban Health agenda]. Moscow, Avtonomnaya nekommercheskaya organizatsiya «Moskovskii urbanisticheskii forum» Publ., 2019, 600 p. (in Russian).
  18. Savelyev S.I., Bondarev V.A., Nakhichevanskaja N.V., Polyakova M.F., Yuriev G.A., Saltykov V.M., Golovanova E.A. Using data from a regional information fund of social and environmental health monitoring to assess human health risks in Lipetsk. Health Risk Analysis, 2013, no. 1, pp. 41–51. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2013.1.06.eng
  19. Ovchinnikova E.L., Nikitin S.V., Kolchin A.S., Novikova Yu.A., Fedorov V.N., Kriga A.S., Plotnikova O.V., Cher-kashina M.N. [et al.]. Methodological approaches to processing laboratory results of ambient air quality monitoring for the purposes of human health risk assessment. ZNiSO, 2022, no. 3, pp. 36–43. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/2022-30-3-36-43 (in Russian).
  20. Gurvich V.B., Kozlovskikh D.N., Vlasov I.A., Chistyakova I.V., Yarushin S.V., Kornilkov A.S., Kuzmin D.V., Malykh O.L. [et al.]. Methodological approaches to optimizing ambient air quality monitoring programs within the framework of the Federal Clean Air Project (on the example of Nizhny Tagil). ZNiSO, 2020, no. 9, pp. 38–47. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/2020-330-9-38-47 (in Russian).
Received: 
05.02.2023
Approved: 
11.03.2023
Accepted for publication: 
25.03.2023

You are here