Mycotoxin contamination of fresh berries and fruits marketed in the central region of Russia

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
614.31: 543.51: 543.544.5.068.7: 543.64
Authors: 

I.B. Sedova1, Z.A. Chalyy1, N.R. Efimochkina1, I.E. Sokolov1, V.А. Koltsov2, T.V. Zhidekhina2, S.A. Sheveleva1, V.A. Tutelyan1,3

Organization: 

1Federal Research Centre of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, 2/14 Ustinskii proezd, Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation
2I.V. Michurin Federal Research Centre, 30 Michurin Str., Michurinsk, 393774, Russian Federation
3I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 8 Trubetskaya Str., bldg 2, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

New emerging strains of toxigenic molds in agricultural areas and insufficient data on levels of their toxic metabolites occurring in domestic horticultural fruits and berries require risk assessment of MT contamination for this plant group of mass consumer products.
This study concentrated on samples of fresh fruits and berries sold on the consumer market (185 samples, including 127 intact and 58 with signs of deformation and molding). We applied our own developed technique for quantification of mycotoxins based on HPLC-MS/MS.
In this study, we were the first in the RF to examine contamination of garden strawberries, raspberries, currants, huck-leberries, blueberries, gooseberries, dogwood, plums, blackthorn, apples, pears) with 27 MT including poorly studied emergent MT (EMT), produced by Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium and Alternaria.
Strawberries, gooseberries, black currants and raspberries turned out to be the most contaminated with MT; red currants, apples and pears were less contaminated. The greatest variety of MT and EMT species was found in strawberries (23 MT), gooseberries (8 MT), black currants (7 MT) and raspberries (6 MT).
Among the regulated MT, fumonisins B1 and B2, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2 toxin, ochratoxin A and aflatoxin B1 were detected in intact strawberries; patulin, in raspberries; deoxynivalenol and zearalenone, in black currant. As for damaged and moldy berries and fruits, the list of detectable toxins was expanded, primarily due to the detection of several types of unregulated EMTs. EMT tenuazonic acid was mainly detected in moldy berries; its levels increased manifold in almost all species, except for strawberries in which penicillic acid prevailed.
These new data on MT contamination in fruits and berries indicate the necessity to perform in-depth hygienic assessment of such products sold on the Russian market to identify MT, EMT and their producers. The obtained results will be used to identify hazards at the first stage in risk assessment with its focus on MT and EMT contamination of fresh fruits and berries.

Keywords: 
mycotoxins, emergent mycotoxins, strawberry, raspberry, contamination, HPLC-MS/MS
Sedova I.B., Chalyy Z.A., Efimochkina N.R., Sokolov I.E., Koltsov V.А., Zhidekhina T.V., Sheveleva S.A., Tutelyan V.A. Mycotoxin contamination of fresh berries and fruits marketed in the central region of Russia. Health Risk Analysis, 2022, no. 4, pp. 87–99. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2022.4.08.eng
References: 
  1. Microbial Food Safety. In: O.A. Oyarzabal, S. Backert eds. New York, Springer, 2012, 262 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1177-2
  2. Vybornova M.V., Polunina T.S., Lavrinova V.A. Micobiota of currant berries. Nauchnye trudy Severo-Kavkazskogo Federal'nogo nauchnogo tsentra sadovodstva, vinogradarstva, vinodeliya, 2020, vol. 29, pp. 122–126. DOI: 10.30679/2587-9847-2020-29-122-126 (in Russian).
  3. Enikova R.K., Stoynovska M.R., Karcheva M.D. Mycotoxins in Fruits and Vegetables. J. of IMAB, 2020, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 3139–3143. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020262.3139
  4. Gonçalves B.L., Coppa C.F.S.C., de Neeff D.V., Corassin C.H., Fernandes Oliveira C.A. Mycotoxins in fruits and fruit-based products: occurrence and methods for decontamination. Toxin Reviews, 2013, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 263–272. DOI: 10.1080/15569543.2018.1457056
  5. Tournas V.H., Katsoudas E. Mould and yeast flora in fresh berries, grapes and citrus fruits. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2005, vol. 105, pp. 11–17 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.05.002
  6. Meena M., Gupta S.K., Swapnil P., Zehra A., Dubey M.K., Upadhyay R.S. Alternaria toxins: potential virulence factors and genes related to pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol., 2017, vol. 8, pp. 1451. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01451
  7. Gruber-Dorninger C., Novak B., Nagl V., Berthiller F. Emerging Mycotoxins: Beyond Traditionally Determined Food Contaminants. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2017, vol. 65, no. 33, pp. 7052–7070. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03413
  8. Fraeyman S., Croubels S., Devreese M., Antonissen G. Emerging Fusarium and Alternaria Mycotoxins: Occurrence, Toxicity and Toxicokinetics. Toxins, 2017, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 228. DOI: 10.3390/toxins9070228
  9. Medina A., Rodríguez A., Magan N. Climate change and mycotoxigenic fungi: impacts on mycotoxin production. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 99–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2015.11.002
  10. Gannibal Ph.B. Species of the genus Alternaria revealed in Russia and some neighboring territories. Mikologiya i fi-topatologiya, 2015, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 374–385 (in Russian).
  11. Stakheev A.A., Samokhvalova L.V., Ryazantsev D.Yu., Zavriev S.K. Molecular genetic approaches for investigation of taxonomy and specific identification of toxin-producing Fusarium species: achievements and problems (review). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya, 2016, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 275–284. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2016.3.275rus (in Russian).
  12. Kiseleva M.G., Chalyy Z.A., Sedova I.B., Minaeva L.P., Sheveleva S.A. Studying the contamination of tea and herbal infusions with myсotoxins (Message 2). Health Risk Analysis, 2020, no. 1, pp. 38–51. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2020.1.04.eng
  13. Fernández-Cruz M.L., Mansilla M.L., Tadeo J.L. Mycotoxins in fruits and their processed products: Analysis, occur-rence and health implications. J. Adv. Res., 2010, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2010.03.002
  14. Alshannaq A., Yu J.-H. Occurrence, toxicity, and analysis of major mycotoxins in food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2017, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 632. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060632
  15. Eskola M., Kos G., Elliott C.T., Hajslova J., Mayar S., Krska R. Worldwide contamination of food-crops with myco-toxins: Validity of the widely cited ‘FAO estimate’ of 25 %. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2020, vol. 60, no. 16, pp. 2773–2789. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570
  16. Juan C., Chamari K., Manes J. Evaluation of Alternaria mycotoxins: quantification and storage condition. Food Addi-tives and Contaminants: Part A, 2016, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 861–868. DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1177375
  17. Rychlik M., Lepper H., Weidner C., Asam S. Risk evaluation of the Alternaria mycotoxin tenuazonic acid in foods for adults and infants and subsequent risk management. Food Control, 2016, vol. 68, pp. 181–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.035
  18. Solfrizzo M. Recent advances on Alternaria mycotoxins. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2017, vol. 17, pp. 57–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2017.09.012
  19. Kłapeć T., Wócik-Fatla A., Farian E., Kowalczyk K., Cholewa G., Cholewa A., Dutkiewicz J. Mycobiota of berry fruits: levels of filamentous fungi and mycotoxins, composition of fungi, and analysis of the potential health risk for consumers. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med., 2022, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 28–37. DOI: 10.26444/aaem/147297
  20. Andersen B., Thrane U. Foodborne fungi in fruit and cereals and their production of mycotoxins. Advances in Food Mycology, 2006, vol. 571, pp. 137–152. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28391-9_8
  21. Waśkiewicz A., Irzykowska L., Bocianowski J., Karolewski Z., Weber Z., Goliński P. Fusariotoxins in asparagus – their biosynthesis and migration. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A, 2013, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1332–1338. DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2013.796095
  22. Aziz N.H., Moussa L.A.A. Influence of gamma-radiation on mycotoxin producing moulds and mycotoxins in fruits. Food Control, 2002, vol. 13, no. 4–5, pp. 281–288. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00028-2
Received: 
11.10.2022
Approved: 
16.11.2022
Accepted for publication: 
18.12.2022

You are here