Assesment of scientists’ lifestyle and risk factors affecting their professional efficiency

View or download the full article: 

M.D. Vasiliev1, E.V. Makarova1, A.A. Kostrov1, S.A. Palevskaya1,2, S.M. Smbatyan1,3


1N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, bldg. 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Str., Moscow, 105064, Russian Federation
2Samara State Medical University, 18 Gagarina Str., Samara, 443079, Russian Federation
3M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), bldg. 1, 61/2 Shchepkina Str., Moscow, 129110, Russian Federation


People involved in scientific research should keep their cognitive status high since this is necessary for preserving their intellectual potential and maintaining their work efficiency. Given that, it seems important to determine what impacts scientific work might have on mental health, to estimate potential disorders and to develop a strategy aimed at preventing cognitive impairments. Our research goals were to perform screening assessment of executive functions, to examine signs of premature ageing and to explore behavioral and social risk factors among Russian researchers.

We accomplished a cross-sectional study with 213 researchers employed by state scientific institutions in Moscow participating in it; they were 116 women and 97 men aged from 23 to 78 years (their average age was 45.48 ± 15.33 years).

As a result, we established that risk factors causing a decline in professional efficiency were rather frequent among the participants. Probable cognitive disorders were detected in 9.85 % of them and we should note that these disorders were not age-related. We detected signs of senile asthenia in 3.28 % of the participants and senile depression in 2.34 %. Two thirds of the participants had subclinical depression (74.6 %). Only one fifth of the respondents (19.71 %, n = 42) did not have any cognitive impairments, asthenic syndrome, or depression. A quarter of the researchers (25.34 %) were not sufficiently committed to healthy lifestyle. Low physical activity established for 79.3 % of the respondents was the major risk factor; among others, we can mention irrational nutrition, primarily among those researchers who worked with students; poor stress management skills among physicians who combined clinical practice with science; difficulties in interpersonal relationships among people who dealt solely with research.

It is necessary to implement corporate programs aimed at prevention and rehabilitations for researchers in order to preserve their scientific activity and professional efficiency as well as to extend their professional longevity/

professional longevity, researchers, doctors, teachers, intellectual work, quality of life, cognitive functions, lifestyle
Vasiliev M.D., Makarova E.V., Kostrov A.A., Palevskaya S.A., Smbatyan S.M. Assesment of scientists’ lifestyle and risk factors affecting their professional efficiency. Health Risk Analysis, 2022, no. 2, pp. 98–106. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2022.2.09.eng
  1. Minnibaev T.Sh. Topical issues of university hygiene at the present stage. Health, education of children and young adults in XXI century: Health & Education Millennium World congress, 2004.
  2. Ackerman P.L, Kanfer R., Goff M. Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1995, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 270–304. DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.1.4.270
  3. Tucker A.M., Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in aging. Curr. Alzheimer Res., 2011, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 354–360. DOI: 10.2174/156720511795745320
  4. Gadzhiev G.D., Grechany G.V. Influence of industrial factors on indices of diseases of employees of scientific research institutes of the Irkutsk Centre of Science of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Science. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal (Irkutsk), 2007, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 70–73 (in Russian).
  5. Ratai T.V., Tarasenko I.I. Nauchnye kadry: tendentsiya snizheniya sokhranyaetsya: ekspress-informatsiya ISIEZ NIU VShE «Nauka, tekhnologii, innovatsii» [Scientific personnel: the downward trend continues. Express information provided by ISSEK NRU HSE “Science, technology, innovation”]. ISIEZ NIU VShE, 2019. Available at: (19.06.2021) (in Russian).
  6. Dellenbach M., Zimprich D. Typical intellectual engagement and cognition in old age. Neu-ropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn., 2008, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 208–231. DOI: 10.1080/13825580701338094
  7. Imlach A.-R., Ward D.D., Stuart K.E., Summers M.J., Valenzuela M.J., King A.E., Saunders N.L., Summers J. [et al.]. Age is no barrier: predictors of academic success in older learners. NPJ Sci. Learn., 2017, vol. 2, pp. 13. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-017-0014-5
  8. Aschwanden D., Schumacher V., Zimmermann K., Werner C., Allemand M., Zimprich D., Martin M. Do Professors Better Maintain Cognitive Functioning in Older Age? GeroPsych, 2019, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–17. DOI: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000201
  9. Salthouse T.A. Mental Exercise and Mental Aging: Evaluating the Validity of the “Use It or Lose It” Hypothesis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 2006, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 68–87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00005.x
  10. Head D., Kennedy K.M., Rodrigue K.M., Raz N. Age differences in perseveration: cognitive and neuroanatomical mediators of performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychologia, 2009, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1200–1203. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.003
  11. Singh-Manoux A., Kivimaki M., Glymour M.M., Elbaz A., Berr C., Ebmeier K.P., Ferrie J.E., Dugravot A. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ, 2012, vol. 344, pp. d7622. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d7622
  12. Eckert M.A. Slowing down: age-related neurobiological predictors of processing speed. Front. Neurosci., 2011, vol. 5, pp. 25. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00025
  13. Shleptsova M.V., Frolova E.V. Prevalence of the geriatric syndromes in geriatric practice in outpatient clinic and possible ways of its correction. Rossiiskii semeinyi vrach, 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 30–36. DOI: 10.17816/RFD2018230-36 (in Russian).
  14. Christensen H., Henderson A.S., Griffiths K., Levings C. Does aging inevitably lead to de-clines in cognitive performance? A longitudinal study of elite academics. Personality and Individual Differences, 1997, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 67–78. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00022-6
  15. Massé R., Poulin C., Dassa C., Lambert J., Bélair S., Battaglini A. The structure of mental health: higher-order confirmatory factor analyses of psychological distress and well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 1998, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 475–504. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1006992032387
  16. Vilas Boas A.A., Morin E.M. Quality of working life in public higher education institutions: The perception of Brazilian and Canadian professors. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2013, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 67–77. Available at: (11.08.2021).
  17. Kuznetsova A.R. Osobennosti podgotovki nauchnykh kadrov dlya sistemy obrazovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Features of training scientific personnel for the education system in the Russian Federation]. Sovremennoe obrazovanie: tekhnologii, metodika, nauka: materialy vserossiiskoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii v chest' 65-letiya kafedry matematiki FGBOU VO «Bashkirskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet», 2018, pp. 45–48 (in Russian).
  18. De Paula A.V., Vilas Boas A.A. Well-being and quality of working life of university professors in Brazil. Quality of Life and Quality of Working Life. In: A.A. Vilas Boas ed. Chapter 10. IntechOpen: World's first Open Access book publisher, 2017, 312 p. DOI: 10.5772 /intechopen.70237
  19. Maarof N.N.N.A., Shamsuddin N.R., Razali N.M., Hadi A.A., Ismail A. A comparative study of health-related quality of life among academician – A case study. 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE). Available at: (07.10.2021).
  20. Isayev A., Nikiforov G., Rodionova Ye. Psychology of professional health: a review of concepts. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial'noi raboty, 2019, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 114–122 (in Russian).
Accepted for publication: 

You are here