Preventive measures to reduce harmful effects produced by electromagnetic radiation on health

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2021-3-4.pdf
UDC: 
614.87
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2021.3.04.eng
Authors: 

Y. Stein1,2

Organization: 

1Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Campus Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, 9112102, Israel
2Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract: 

Man-made electromagnetic waves are the most widely and rapidly expanding exposure in today's world, including exposure in several frequency groups: extremely low frequencies (ELF) from electricity lines, hybrid car batteries and high power lines (>3 Hz–3 kHz), radiofrequency (RF) and microwave frequencies including millimeter waves (3 kHz–300 GHz) from mobile phones, towers, base stations and wireless devices, and intermediate frequencies "Dirty Electricity" emitted from power lines.

While such organizations as ICNIRP (the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) still continue to claim that electromagnetic radiation can cause "only thermal effects", clinging to theory that does not match facts and upholding obsolete thermal safety standards, extensive scientific evidence has clearly demonstrated that non-thermal health effects produced by electromagnetic radiation do exist, are important to health, and should be taken into consideration when safety standards are set. This review aims to highlight some evidence of biologic effects in various body systems, and to suggest preventive measures to reduce such effects on health.

Exposure to electromagnetic radiation at intensities lower than thermal safety standards has been associated with non-thermal biological effects including damage and changes to cells and DNA.

This review presents evidence of such effects demonstrated in: the hematologic system, the nervous system, the immune system, the reproductive system, the skin and muscles, the cardiovascular system, glucose metabolism, and Electrohypersensitivity ("Microwave sickness"). Protective measures are then suggested to reduce these effects.

Keywords: 
electromagnetic radiation, non-thermal exposure, health, electrohypersensitivity, protective measures, safety standards
Stein Y. Preventive measures to reduce harmful effects produced by electromagnetic radiation on health. Health Risk Analysis, 2021, no. 3, pp. 42–53. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2021.3.04.eng
References: 
  1. Markov M. Thermal Vs. Nonthermal Mechanisms of Interactions Between Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Sys-tems. Bioelectromagnetics Current Concepts. NATO Security Through Science Series. In: S.N. Ayrapetyan, M.S. Markov eds. Dordrecht, Springer, 2006, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4278-7_1
  2. ICNIRP Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 Khz To 300 ghz). Health Phys, 2020, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 483–524. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210
  3. Belpomme D., Hardell L., Belyaev I., Burgio E., Carpenter D.O. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low inten-sity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environmental Pollution, 2018, vol. 242, pt. A, pp. 643–658. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019
  4. Lai H., Singh N.P. Melatonin and N-tert-butyl-alpha-phenylnitrone block 60-Hz magnetic field-induced DNA single and double strand breaks in rat brain cells. J. Pineal Res, 1997, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 152–162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-079x.1997.tb00317.x
  5. Udroiu I., Cristaldi M., Ieradi L.A., Bedini A., Giuliani L., Tanzarella C. Clastogenicity and aneuploidy in newborn and adult mice exposed to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Int. J. Rad. Biol., 2006, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 561–567. DOI: 10.1080/09553000600876660
  6. Zothansiama, Zosangzuali M., Lalramdinpuii M., Jagetia G.C. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromagnetic Biology & Medicine, 2017, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 295–305. DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2017.1350584
  7. Marino A.A. Time-dependent hematological changes in workers exposed to electromagnetic fields. Am. Ind. Hyg. As-soc. J., 1995, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 189–192. DOI: 10.1080/15428119591017231
  8. Lai H. Exposure to Static and Extremely-Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and Cellular Free Radicals. Electro-magnetic Biology and Medicine, 2019, vol. 38, no 4, pp. 231–248. DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2019.1656645
  9. Kim J.H., Lee J.-K., Kim H.-G., Kim K.-B., Kim H.R. Possible Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Ex-posure on Central Nerve System, Biomol. Ther., 2019, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 265–275. DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.152
  10. Sheppard A.R., Bawin S.M., Adey W.R. Models of long‐range order in cerebral macromolecules: Effects of sub‐ELF and of modulated VHF and UHF fields. Radio Science, 1979, vol. 14, no. 6S, pp. 141–145. DOI: 10.1029/RS014i06Sp00141
  11. Eberhardt J.L., Persson B.R., Brun A.E., Salford L.G., Malmgren L.O. Blood-brain barrier permeability and nerve cell damage in rat brain 14 and 28 days after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Electromagn. Biol. Med., 2008, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 215–229. DOI: 10.1080/15368370802344037
  12. Carrubba S., Frilot C. 2nd, Chesson A.L. Jr., Marino A.A. Mobile-phone pulse triggers evoked potentials. Neurosci. Lett., 2010, vol. 469, no. 1, pp. 164–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.11.068
  13. Benassi B., Filomeni G., Montagna C., Merla C., Lopresto V., Pinto R., Marino C., Consales C. Extremely Low Fre-quency Magnetic Field (ELF-MF) Exposure Sensitizes SH-SY5Y Cells to the Pro-Parkinson's Disease Toxin MPP (.). Mol. Neurobiol., 2016, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 4247–4260. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-015-9354-4
  14. Bobkova N.V., Novikov V.V., Medvinskaya N.I., Aleksandrova I.Y., Nesterova I.V., Fesenko E.E. Effect of weak combined static and extremely low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on spatial memory and brain amyloid-β in two animal models of Alzheimer’s disease. Electromagn. Biol. Med., 2018, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 127–137. DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2018.1471700
  15. Terzi M., Ozberk B., Deniz O.G., Kaplan S. The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders. J. Chem. Neuroanat., 2016, vol. 7, pt. B, pp. 77–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.04.003
  16. Byun Y.-H., Ha M., Kwon H.-J., Hong Y.-C., Leem J.-H., Sakong J., Kim S.Y., Lee C.G. [et al.]. Mobile Phone Use, Blood Lead Levels, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms in Children: a longitudinal study. PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. e59742. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059742
  17. Pall M.L. Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health. Environmental Research, 2018, no. 164, pp. 405–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.035
  18. Pall M.L. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. J. Chem. Neuroanat., 2016, vol. 75, pt. B, pp. 43–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001
  19. Szmigielski S. Reaction of the immune system to low-level RF/MW exposures. Sci. Total. Environ., 2013, vol. 454–455, pp. 393–400. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.034
  20. El-Gohary O.A., Said M.A. Effect of electromagnetic waves from mobile phone on immune status of male rats: possi-ble protective role of vitamin D. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 2017, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 151–156. DOI: 10.1139/cjpp-2016-0218
  21. Marshall T.G., Rumann Heil T.J. Electrosmog and autoimmune disease. Immunol. Res., 2017, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 129–135. DOI 10.1007/s12026-016-8825-7
  22. Lushnikov K.V., Gapeev A.B., Sadovnikov V.B., Chemeris N.K. Effect of the weak extremely-high-frequency elec-tromagnetic radiation on the indices of the Humoral Immunity in healthy mice. Biophysics, 2001, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 711–719.
  23. Belpomme D., Irigaray P. Electrohypersensitivity as a Newly Identified and Characterized Neurologic Pathological Disorder: How to Diagnose, Treat, and Prevent It. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1915. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21061915
  24. Saygin M., Asci H., Ozmen O., Cankara F.N., Dincoglu D., Ilhan I. Impact of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation on the testicular inflammatory pathway biomarkers in young rats: The role of gallic acid. Environ. Toxicol., 2016, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1771–1784. DOI: 10.1002/tox.22179
  25. Schauer I., Mohamad Al-Ali B. Combined effects of varicocele and cell phones on semen and hormonal parameters. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2018, vol. 130, pp. 335–340. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-017-1277-9
  26. Johansson O., Hilliges M., Björnhagen V., Hall K. Skin changes in patients claiming to suffer from “screen dermatitis”: a two-case open-field provocation study. Exp. Dermatol., 1994, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 234–238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.1994.tb00282.x
  27. Johansson O., Liu P.-Y. “Electrosensitivity”, “electrosupersensitivity” and “screen dermatitis”: preliminary observa-tions from on-going studies in the human skin. Proceedings of the COST 244: Biomedical Effects of Electromagnetic Fields. Workshop on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. In: D. Simunic ed. Brussels/Graz: EU/EC (DG XIII), 1995, pp. 52–57.
  28. Cardona-Hernández M.A., Fierro-Arias L., Cabrera Pérez A.L., Vidal-Flores A.A. Efectos de la radiación electro-magnética en la piel [Effects of electromagnetic radiation on skin]. Dermatol. Rev. Mex., 2017, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 292–302 (in Spain).
  29. Simon D., Daubos A., Pain C., Fitoussi R., Vié K., Taieb A., de Benetti L., Cario-André M. Exposure to acute elec-tromagnetic radiation of mobile phone exposure range alters transiently skin homeostasis of a model of pigmented reconstructed epidermis. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 2013, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 27–34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2012.00746.x
  30. Esen F., Esen H. Effect of electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular phones on the latency of evoked electrodermal activity. Int. J. Neurosci., 2006, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 321–329. DOI: 10.1080/00207450500403371
  31. Feldman Y., Puzenko A., Ishai P.B., Caduff A., Davidovich I., Sakran F., Agranat A.J. The electromagnetic response of human skin in the millimetre and submillimetre wave range. Phys. Med. Biol., 2009, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3341–3363. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/11/005
  32. Blank M. Electric stimulation of protein synthesis in muscle. Advances in Chemistry, 1995, vol. 250, pp. 143–153. DOI: 10.1021/ba-1995-0250.ch009
  33. McCarty D.E., Carrubba S., Chesson A.L., Frilot C., Gonzalez-Toledo E., Marino A.A. Electromagnetic hypersensi-tivity: evidence for a novel neurological syndrome. Int. J. Neurosci., 2011, vol. 121, no. 12, pp. 670–676. DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2011.608139
  34. Vangelova K., Deyanov C., Israel M. Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health., 2006, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 133–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.09.008
  35. Wilen J., Hornsten R., Sandstrom M., Bjerle P., Wiklund U., Stensson O., Lyskov E., Mild K.H. Electromagnetic field exposure and health among RF plastic sealer operators. Bioelectromagnetics, 2004, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–15. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10154
  36. Zhang X., Gao Y., Dong J., Wang S., Yao B., Zhang J., Hu S., Xu X. [et al.] The Compound Chinese Medicine “Kang Fu Ling” Protects against High Power Microwave-Induced Myocardial Injury. PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. e101532. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101532
  37. Shuvy M., Abedat S., Beeri R., Valitzki M., Stein Y., Meir K., Lotan C. Electromagnetic fields promote severe and unique vascular calcification in an animal model of ectopic calcification. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, 2014, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 345–350. DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2014.05.001
  38. Falcioni L., Bua L., Tibaldi E., Lauriola M., De Angelis L., Gnudi F., Mandrioli D., Manservigi M. [et al.]. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environ. Res., 2018, vol. 165, pp. 496–503. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.037
  39. NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in Sprague Dawley Rats Exposed to Whole-body Radio Frequency Radiation at a Frequency (900 Mhz) and Modulations (GSM and CDMA) Used by Cell Phones: Technical Report 595. National Toxicology Program. Public Health Service. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018. Available at: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr595_508.pdf?utm_source=di... (05.06.2021).
  40. Meo S.A., Rubeaan K.Al. Effects of exposure to electromagnetic field radiation (EMFR) generated by activated mobile phones on fasting blood glucose. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health., 2013, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 235–241. DOI: 10.2478/s13382-013-0107-1
  41. Salah M.B., Abdelmelek H., Abderraba M. Effects of olive leave extract on metabolic disorders and oxidative stress in-duced by 2.45 GHz WIFI signals. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2013, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 826–834. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2013.07.013
  42. Stein Y., Udasin I. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS, microwave syndrome) – Review of mechanisms. Envi-ronmental Research, 2020, vol. 186, pp. 09445. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109445
  43. Belyaev I. Biophysical Mechanisms for Nonthermal Microwave Effects. Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medi-cine (1st ed.). In: M.S. Markov ed. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2015, Chapter 5, pp. 49–68.
  44. Blackman C.F., Kinney L.S., House D.E., Joines W.T. Multiple power-density windows and their possible origin. Bioelectromagnetics, 1989, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115–128. DOI:10.1002/bem2250100202
  45. Liboff A.R. Geomagnetic cyclotron resonance in living cells. J. Biological. Phys., 1985, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 99–102.
  46. Panagopoulos D.J., Karabarbounis A., Margaritis L.H. Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells. Bio-chemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2002, vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 95–102. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02393-8
  47. Friedman J., Kraus S., Hauptman Y., Schiff Y., Seger R. Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. The Biochemical journal, 2007, vol. 405, no. 3, pp. 559–568. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20061653
  48. Giuliani L., D’Emilia E., Grimaldi S., Lisi A., Bobkova N., Zhadin M.N. Investigating the Icr Effect in a Zhadin’s Cell. Int. J. Biomed. Sci., 2009, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 181–186.
  49. Zhadin M. On mechanism of combined extremely weak magnetic field action on aquaeous solution of amino acid. Non-thermal effects and mechanisms of interaction between electromagnetic fields and living matter. ICEMS Monograph. Eur. J. Oncology., 2010, vol. 5, pp. 1–5.
  50. Blank M., Goodman R. DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2011, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 409–415. DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2011.538130
  51. Guideline of the Austrian Medical Association for diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and ill-nesses (EMF Syndrome). Austrian Medical Association, 2012. Available at: https://vagbrytaren.org/Guideline%20%20AG-EMF.pdf (11.08.2021).
  52. Belyaev I., Dean A., Eger H., Hubmann G., Jandrisovits R., Kern M., Kundi M., Moshammer H. [et al.]. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev. Environ. Health., 2016, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 363–397. DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0011
  53. O rekomendatsiyakh roditelyam po bezopasnomu ispol'zovaniyu mobil'nogo telefona [Recommendations for parents on the safe use of a mobile phone]. Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelei i blagopoluchiya cheloveka. Available at: https://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/about/info/news/news_details.php?ELEMENT_... (15.07.2021) (in Russian).
  54. What you need to know about wireless radiation and your baby. The Baby Safe Project. Available at: https://128441a4-6b5e-4ac8-8d74-a461f5bada16.filesusr.com.ugd/2cea04_974... (04.06.2021).
  55. Living with Technology, Children's Health Remains their Inexplicable Right and our Own Obligation: Press release 24 June 2019. Cyprus Committee on Environment and Children's Health. Available at: https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/PRESS-RELEASE-Cyprus-2019-Campaig... (07.06.2021).
  56. Mallery-Blythe E. 2020 Consensus Statement of UK and International Medical and Scientific Experts and Practition-ers on Health Effects of Non-Ionising Radiation (NIR). Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment (PHIRE) & British Society for Ecological Medicine (BSEM). Available at: https://phiremedical.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2020-Non-Ionising-Ra... (07.06.2021).
  57. Switzerland Doctors For Environmental Protection. 2020 Consensus Statement of UK and International Medical and Scientific Experts and Practitioners on Health Effects of Non-Ionising Radiation (NIR). Available at: https://ehtrust.org/science/medical-doctors-consensus-statements-recomme... (07.06.2021).
  58. Cell Phone Radiation & Children’s Health: What Parents Need to Know. American academy of Pediatrics. Available at: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/all-around/Pag... (08.06.2021).
  59. 10 Years after the Freiburg Appeal: Radio-frequency Radiation Poses a Health Risk. Physicians Demand Overdue Pre-caution. International Doctors ́Appeal 2012. Available at: http://freiburger-appell-2012.info/media/Interna-tional_Doctors_Appeal_2... (17.05.2021).
  60. Di Ciaula A. 5G networks in European Countries: appeal for a standstill in the respect of the precautionary principle. International Society of Doctors for Environment. Available at: https://www.isde.org/5G_appeal.pdf (14.06.2021).
  61. The Venice Resolution. International commission for electromagnetic safety, 2008. Available at: http://www.icems.eu/resolution.htm (13.06.2021).
  62. The Benevento Resolution. International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety, 2006. Available at: http://www.icems.eu/docs/BeneventoResolution_REVISED_march2008.pdf (13.06.2021).
  63. Scientists call for Protection from Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Field Exposure: International Appeal. Available at: https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal (20.06.2021).
  64. Simunic D. Measurement of RF Near and Far Fields. WHO International Seminar on Biological Effects, Health Con-sequences and Standards for Pulsed Radiofrequency fields. Erice, November 21–30, 1999.
  65. Step by step to safe technology. Environmental Health Trust. Available at: https://ehtrust.org/resources-to-share/printable-resources/ (17.08.2021).
  66. Belpomme D., Hardell L., Belyaev I., Burgio E., Carpenter D.O. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environ. Pollut., 2018, vol. 242, pt. A, pp. 643–658. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019
  67. Kostoff N., Heroux P., Aschner M., Tsatsakis A. Adverse Effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions. Toxicology Letters, 2020, vol. 323, pp. 35–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.01.020
  68. Russian National Committee of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection – 2008 report. Available at: https://www.who.int/peh-emf/project/mapnatreps/RUSSIA%20report%202008.pdf (11.08.2021).
  69. Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G. Increased radiation from cell towers poses potential risks, say sci-entists from around the world. Environmental Health Trust, 2017. Available at: https://ehtrust.org/scientists-and-doctors-demand-moratorium-on-5g-warni... (09.06.2021).
  70. The 5G appeal. Available at: https://www.5gappeal.eu/ (09.06.2021).
  71. Stop 5G on Earth and in Space: International Appeal, An Emergency Appeal to the World’s Governments by Scien-tists, Doctors, Environmental Organizations and Others. Available at: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal (20.06.2021).
  72. El-Hajj A.M., Naous T. Radiation Analysis in a Gradual 5G Network Deployment Strategy. 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), 2020, pp. 448–453. DOI: 10.1109/5GWF49715.2020.9221314
  73. Ishai P.B. The Green Dilemma of 5G Densification. The Times of Israel. Available at: https://blogs.time-sofisrael.com/the-green-dilemma-of-5g-densification/ (19.06.2021).
Received: 
03.06.2021
Accepted: 
15.09.2021
Published: 
30.09.2021

You are here

Home