Adherence to vaccination and perception of COVID-19 risk among populaiton in the Republic of Belarus

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2021-3-1.pdf
UDC: 
[616-039.71:578.834.1] (476)
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2021.3.01.eng
Authors: 

E.A. Hutsich, S.I. Sychyk, S.L. Itpayeva-Liudchyk

Organization: 

Scientific practical centre of hygiene, 8 Akademicheskaya Str., Minsk, 220012, Republic of Belarus

Abstract: 

Our research goal was to examine health risk perception and adherence to vaccination against COVID-19 among various social and demographic population groups in Belarus.

To achieve this goal, a cross-sectional study was accomplished via using an online poll. The obtained results reveal that perception of health risks caused by COVID-19 is quite significant among people living in Belarus since only 9.9 % of the questioned do not consider COVID-19 a dangerous disease. Higher levels of risk perception have been detected among medical personnel, older age groups, and people with chronic pathologies.

Most respondents believe vaccination is among the most efficient anti-COVID-19 measures; however, people are rather poorly aware about provided opportunities to get vaccinated. 33.6 % among respondents who are not vaccinated don’t plan to do it with; their basic reasons for this refusal are lack of trust, both in vaccines being safe and efficient and overall trust in preparations suggested for vaccination. Having analyzed answers given by respondents who were medical workers we revealed that a greater share of them were vaccinated but reasons for refusing from vaccination were the same. 20.1 % respondents from all groups and 21.2 % medical workers who took part in the questioning stated that they needed additional information about vaccination.

When developing communication strategies aimed at raising awareness among population, we should bear in mind that lower perception of COVID-19-related health risks and refusal from vaccination are more widely spread among people younger than 40; people who don’t have higher education; people with minor children in their families. Prevalence of lower COVID-19-related health risk perception is also greater among men; people who don’t live in the capital; people with elderly relatives in their families. Internet resources, data provided by the WHO and Public Healthcare Ministry, and medical personnel are considered the most reliable sources of information by population in Belarus.

Keywords: 
poll, coronavirus, COVID-19, pandemic, risk perception, vaccination, hesitation regarding vaccination, social and demographic factors, population awareness, population health
Hutsich E.A., Sychyk S.I., Itpayeva-Liudchyk S.L. Adherence to vaccination and perception of COVID-19 risk among populaiton in the Republic of Belarus. Health Risk Analysis, 2021, no. 3, pp. 4–13. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2021.3.01.eng
References: 
  1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. World health organization, 2021. Available at: https://covid19.who.int/ (26.07.2021).
  2. COVID-19 strategy update. World health organization, 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-strategy-update (26.07.2021).
  3. Randolph H.E., Barreiro L.B. Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity, 2020, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 737–741. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.012
  4. Statement – COVID-19: The stakes are still high. Statement by Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge, WHO Regional Director for Europe. WHO, Regional office for Europe, 2021. Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/ru/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus... (26.07.2021).
  5. Coustasse A., Kimble C., Maxik K. COVID-19 and Vaccine Hesitancy. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 2021, vol. 44, no. 1. pp. 71–75. DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000360
  6. Freeman D., Bao S. Loe, Chadwick A., Vaccari C., Waite F., Rosebrock L., Jenner L., Petit A.[еt al.]. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: The Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (Oceans) II. Psychological Medicine, 2020, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720005188
  7. Neumann-Böhme S., Varghese N.E., Sabat I., Barros P.P., Brouwer W., van Exel J., Schreyögg J., Stargardt T. Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur. J. Health Econ., 2020, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 977–982. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01208-6
  8. Edwards B., Biddle N., Gray M., Sollis K. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance: Correlates in a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the Australian population. PLoS One, 2021,
    vol. 16, no. 3, pp. e0248892. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248892 (26.07.2021).
  9. Murphy J., Vallières F., Bentall R.P., Shevlin M., McBride O., Hartman T.K., McKay R., Bennett K. [еt al.]. Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance
    in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nature communications, 2021, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20226-9#citeas (26.07.2021).
  10. Wake A.D. The Willingness to Receive COVID-19 Vaccine and Its Associated Factors: “Vaccination Refusal Could Prolong the War of This Pandemic” – A Systematic Review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 2021, vol. 14, pp. 2609–2623. DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s311074
  11. Troiano G., Nardi A. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public health, 2021, vol. 194, pp. 245–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025
  12. Ten threats to global health in 2019. WHO. Available at: https://www.who.int/ru/newsroom/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-i... (26.07.2021).
  13. Operational guidance: acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, January 2021. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2021, 10 р. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/338855 (26.07.2021).
  14. Alqahtani M.M.J., Arnout B.A., Fadhel F.H., Sufyan N.S. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 and its impact on precautionary behavior: A qualitative study. Patient education and counseling, 2021, vol. 104, no. 8, рр. 1860–1867. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.025
  15. Chatterjee R., Bajwa S., Dwivedi D., Kanj R., Ahammed M., Shaw R. COVID-19 Risk Assessment Tool: Dual application of risk communication and risk governance. Progress in Disaster Science, 2020, vol. 7, pp. 100109. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061720300466 (26.07.2021).
  16. Wise T., Zbozinek T.D., Michelini G., Hagan C.C., Mobbs D. Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Royal Society open science, 2020, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 200742. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.200742 (26.07.2021).
  17. COVID-19 response: Resolution WHA73.1. Seventy-third World Health Assembly. Available at: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA73/A73_R1-en.pdf (26.07.2021).
  18. Leng A., Maitland E., Wang S., Nicholas S., Liu R., Wang J. Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China. Vaccine, 2021, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 247–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009
  19. 20th ETAGE Meeting Report. Virtual meeting, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–12 November 2020. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/338559/WHO-EURO-2021-18... (26.07.2021).
  20. De Bruin W.B. Age Differences in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Mental Health: Evidence From a National U.S. Survey Conducted in March 2020. The Journals of Gerontology, 2021, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. e24–e29. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa074
  21. Barber S.J., Kim H. COVID-19 Worries and Behavior Changes in Older and Younger Men and Women. The Journals of Gerontology, 2021, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. e17–e23. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa068
  22. Mansilla Domínguez J.M., Font Jiménez I., Belzunegui Eraso A., Otero D.P., Díaz Pérez D., Recio Vivas A.M. Risk Perception of COVID-19 Community Transmission among the Spanish Population.
    International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 8967. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8967 (26.07.2021).
  23. Williams L., Gallant A.J., Rasmussen S., Brown Nicholls L.A, Cogan N., Deakin K., Young D., Flowers P. Towards intervention development to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among those at high risk: Outlining evidence-based and theoretically informed future intervention content. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2020, vol. 25, no. 4, рр. 1039–1054. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12468
Received: 
23.08.2021
Accepted: 
20.09.2021
Published: 
30.09.2021

You are here

Home