Theoretical grounds for assessing health risks factors caused by self-isolation

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
614.451
Authors: 

O.V. Mitrokhin, N.A. Ermakova, E.V. Belova

Organization: 

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2 Bldg., 2 Bol'shaya Pirogovskaya Str., Moscow, 119435, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

Billions of people had to face self-isolation for several months due to COVID-19 pandemic; given that, it seems quite vital to provide theoretical grounds for sanitary-hygienic health risk assessment.
Our research objects were people who had to self-isolate during CIVID-19 pandemic. In our research we provided theoretical substantiation for priority health risk factors determined by hypodynamia, hypoxia, improper nutrition, distorted work and leisure regime, and psychoemotional strain. These factors can result in growing morbidity with non-communicable diseases among population.
Our research goal was to give theoretical grounds for sanitary-hygienic assessment of health risk factors caused by self-isolation, to reveal priority health risk factors causing morbidity with non-communicable diseases, and to give recommendations on how to prevent it.
We applied analytical, information, and statistical procedures in our research. Data were obtained from regulatory and legal documents on sanitary-hygienic standardization in the Russian Federation, specifically, data on nutrition hygiene, occupational hygiene, children and teenagers hygiene, etc.; we also revised scientific works published by Russian and foreign authors and analyzed documents issued by the World Health Organization as well as by public healthcare authorities in different countries during COVID-19 pandemic.
When developing theoretical grounds for sanitary-hygienic assessment of health risk factors causing morbidity with non-communicable diseases due to self-isolation, we determined priority risk factors and suggested certain hygienic criteria for assessing self-isolation. We provided theoretical substantiation for a suggested hygienic self-isolation index and its score estimate. The existing system for sanitary-hygienic standardization in the RF fixes requirements for nutrition, work, and leisure regime as well as people’s physical activity; it was applied for performing hygienic assessment of self-isolation and self-isolation index score estimates.
We suggested certain activities aimed at minimizing health risks under self-isolation; these activities were based on sanitary-hygienic standards. Since hypodynamia and hypoxia are primary sanitary-hygienic health risk factors, we suggest sticking to adequate nutrition with optimal energy capacity, proper physical activity, as well as proper work and leisure regimes.

Keywords: 
COVID-19, self-isolation, health risk assessment, sanitary-hygienic standardization, prevention, hygiene, risk factors, population health
Mitrokhin O.V., Ermakova N.A., Belova E.V. Theoretical grounds for assessing health risks factors caused by selfisolation. Health Risk Analysis, 2021, no. 1, pp. 143–150. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2021.1.15.eng
References: 
  1. Singh J.A COVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v. Voluntary home self-isolation. South African Medical Journal, 2020, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 453–455. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020v110i6.14840
  2. Baker E.A., Clark L.L.B. Biopsychopharmacosocial approach to assess impact of social distancing and isolation on mental health in older adults. British journal of community nursing, 2020, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 231–238. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.5.231
  3. Meinert E.A., Milne-Ives M.A., Surodina S.С., Lam C.A.D. Agile requirements engineering and software planning for a digital health platform to engage the effects of isolation caused by social distancing: Case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.2196/19297
  4. Agureev A.N., Afonin B.V., Sedova E.A., Solovieva A.A., Valuev V.A., Sidorenko L.A. Nutritional Status in the Experiment with 105-Day Isolation as the First Phase of the Mars-500 Project. Hum. Physiol, 2017, no. 43, pp. 793–801.
  5. Rosa C.B., Bañosbc M., Etchemendyb E., García-Palaciosab A., Alcañizbd M. Psychological countermeasures in manned space missions: «EARTH» system for the Mars-500 project. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, vol. 55, part B, pp. 898–908. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.010
  6. Zhang X., Wang F., Zhu C., Wang Z. Willingness to self-isolate when facing a pandemic risk: Model, empirical test, and policy recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010197
  7. Bacon A.M., Corr P.J. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United Kingdom: A personality-based perspective on concerns and intention to self-isolate. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2020, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12423
  8. Vjekoslav P., Zatezalo V.G., Karlović D. Mental health issues and psychological crisis interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic and earthquakes in Croatia. Review paper, 2020, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 193–198. DOI: 10.20471/dec.2020.56.02.07
  9. Zaitseva N.V., Shur P.Z., Kiryanov D.A., Chigvintsev V.M., Dolgikh O.V., Luzhetskii K.P. Methodical approaches to calculating the probability of negative responses for personal human health risk assessment. Profilakticheskaya i klinicheskaya meditsina, 2015, no. 3 (56), pp. 5–11 (in Russian).
  10. Maio G.D.A., Monda V.A., Messina A.A., Polito R.B., Tartaglia N.C., Ambrosio A.C., Pisanelli D.B., Asmundo A.E. [et al.]. Physical activity and modification of lifestyle induce benefits on the health status. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 2020, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1913–1919. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3831972
  11. Bogdan I.V., Gurylina M.V., Chistyakova D.P. The healthy life-style: attitude of population and priority directions. Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2019, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 374–378 (in Russian).
  12. Lister N., Jebeile H., Truby H., Garnett S.P., Varady K.A., Cowell C.T., Collins C.E., Paxton S.J. [et al.]. Fast track to health – Intermittent energy restriction in adolescents with obesity. A randomised controlled trial study protocol. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 2020, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 80–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2019.11.005
  13. Galli F., Reglero G., Bartolini D., Visioli F. Better prepare for the next one. Lifestyle lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Pharma Nutrition, 2020, vol. 12, pp. 100193. DOI: 10.1016/j.phanu.2020.100193
  14. Onishchenko G.G. Actual problems of hygiene science and practice in the preservation of public health. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2015, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 5–9 (in Russian).
  15. Madzhuga A.G., Shashina E.A., Romanov D.B., Khersonskii I.I. Peculiarities of axiological adaptation of university students: health-creating approach. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoi kul'tury, 2020, no. 5, pp. 37–38 (in Russian).
  16. Hoffmann J., Günther J., Geyer K., Stecher L., Rauh K., Kunath J., Meyer D., Sitzberger C. [et al.]. Effects of a lifestyle intervention in routine care on prenatal physical activity – Findings from the cluster-randomised. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2553-7
  17. Zaninotto P., Head J., Steptoe A. Behavioural risk factors and healthy life expectancy: evidence from two longitudinal studies of ageing in England and the US. Scientific Reports, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9 (in Russian).
  18. Hart D.A., Zernicke R.F. Optimal human functioning requires exercise across the lifespan: mobility in a 1 g environment is intrinsic to the Integrity of multiple biological systems. Frontiers in Physiology, 2020, vol. 11, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00156
  19. Kramer A., Kramer K.Z. The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2020, vol. 119, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442
  20. Carbone S.R. Flattening the curve of mental ill-health: the importance of primary prevention in managing the mental health impacts of COVID-19. Mental Health and Prevention, 2020, vol. 19, pp. 200185. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhp.2020.200185
  21. Krut'ko V.N., Dontsov V.I., Potemkina N.S., Smirnova T.M., Fedin K.A., Fedina A.V., Bol'shakov A.M., Khodykina T.M. Information and cognitive technologies of health saving (review). Trudy institute sistemnogo analiza rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2019, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 50–60 (in Russian).
  22. Zhai Y., Du X. Addressing collegiate mental health amid COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 2020, vol. 288, pp. 113003. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113003
  23. Chatterjee A., Gerdes M.W., Martinez S.G. Identification of risk factors associated with obesity and overweight – a machine learning overview. Sensors, 2020, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.3390/s20092734
  24. Gómez-Salgado J., Andrés-Villas M., Domínguez-Salas S., Díaz-Milanés D., Ruiz-Frutos C. Related health factors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3947. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113947
  25. Shen L., Schie J., Ditchburn G., Bei B. Positive and negative emotions: Differential associations with sleep duration and quality in adolescents. J Youth Adolescence, 2018, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2584–2595. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-018-0899-1
  26. Júnior J.G., Moreira M.M., Pinheiro W.R., De Amorim L.M., Lima C.K., Da Silva C. G. L., Neto M.L.R. The mental health of those whose rights have been taken away: An essay on the mental health of indigenous peoples in the face of the 2019 Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. Psychiatry Research, 2020, vol. 289, pp. 113094. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113094
  27. Tzur Bitan D., Grossman-Giron A., Bloch Y., Mayer Y., Shiffman N., Mendlovic S. Fear of COVID-19 scale: Psychometric characteristics, reliability and validity in the Israeli population. Psychiatry Research, 2020, vol. 289, pp. 113100. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113100
  28. Bullón-Vela V., Abete I., Ángeles Zulet M., Tur J.A., Pintó X., Corbella E., Martínez-González M.A., Corella D. [et al.]. Risk factors differentially associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in males and females with metabolic syndrome. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, 2020, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 94–100. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6031/2018
  29. Heinicke V., Halle M. Lifestyle intervention in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Herz, 2020, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 30–38. DOI: 10.1007/s00059-019-04886-y
  30. Savić D. COVID-19 and work from home: Digital transformation of the workforce. Grey Journal, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101–104 (in Russian).
  31. Rimmer А. How can i keep calm during self-isolation? The BMJ, 2020, vol. 369, pp. m1376. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1376
Received: 
19.09.2021
Accepted: 
07.02.2021
Published: 
30.03.2021

You are here