Prevalence of behavioral risk factors that cause contagion with COVID-19 among population in Belarus: results obtained via cross-sectional study

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2020-4-1.pdf
UDC: 
[616-036.21: 578.834.1] (476)
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2020.4.01.eng
Authors: 

S.I. Sychik

Organization: 

Scientific Practical Centre of Hygiene, 8 Akademicheskaya Str., Minsk, 220012, Belarus

Abstract: 

Our research objects were behavioral risk factors that could cause contagion with coronavirus infection (hereinafter called COVID-19).
Our research goal was to assess prevalence of behavioral risk factors that could cause contagion with COVID-19 among population in Belarus.
The present work contains results obtained via online questioning that included 7,590 respondents and employed a specifically designed questionnaire covering most common behavioral risk factors of contagion with COVID-19. The factors were related to adherence to recommendations on physical and social distancing, use of personal protective equipment, and sticking to personal hygiene rules; the questionnaire also asked respondents to give a subjective estimate of their health and whether they had specific symptoms typical for COVID-19. Data analysis involved assessing prevalence of behavioral risk factors, and occurrence of a relation between specific factors and values of prevalence ratio.
We determined prevalence of the most common behavioral risk factors and assessed to what extent risk factors influenced prevalence of subjective complaints by patients that they had symptoms typical for COVID-19. It was shown that certain behavioral risk factors authentically influenced prevalence of subjective symptoms of the disease. Subjective symptoms were more widely spread among respondents who regularly went to work as well as those whose family members regularly went to work or an educational establishment; among respondents who used public transport, went to shopping centers and catering facilities every day; among respondents who didn’t keep social distance, didn’t pay proper attention to personal hygiene, didn’t use antiseptics, and had a habit to touch their face with their hands; among smoking respondents; among respondents who attended mass events, family and corporate parties; and also respondents whose relatives, close friends, or colleagues had returned from abroad.
Our research results can be used for carrying out information campaigns aimed at COVID-19 prevention; they can also give grounds for performing more profound studies on assessing contributions made by various behavioral factors into risks of contagion with COVID-19.

Keywords: 
behavioral risk factors, questionnaire, coronavirus, COVID-19, pandemic, social distancing, personal hygiene, public health
Sychik S.I. Prevalence of behavioral risk factors that cause contagion with COVID-19 among population in belarus: results obtained via cross-sectional study. Health Risk Analysis, 2020, no. 4, pp. 4–11. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2020.4.01.eng
References: 
  1. Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak. World health organization, 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/ith/2019-nCoV_advice_for_international_traffic-rev/ru/ (23.06.2020).
  2. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. World health organization, 2020. Available at: https://covid19.who.int/ (23.06.2020).
  3. West R., Michie S., Rubin G.J., Amlôt R. Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Nature Human Behaviour, 2020, vol. 4, pp. 451–459. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0887-9
  4. West R., Michie S. Routes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and behaviours to block it: a summary. Qeios, 2020, vol. 7, 4 p. DOI: 10.32388/F6M5CB
  5. Geldsetzer P. Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.J Med Internet Res, 2020, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. e18790. DOI: 10.2196/18790
  6. Singh D.R., Sunuwar D.R., Karki K., Ghimire S., Shrestha N. Knowledge and Perception Towards Universal Safety Precautions During Early Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Nepal. Journal of Community Health, 2020, no. 45, pp. 1116–1122. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-020-00839-3
  7. Zhong B.-L., Luo W., Li H.-M., Zhang Q.-Q., Liu X.-Ge, Li W.-T., Li Y. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional Survey. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2020, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1745–1752. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.4522
  8. Azlan A.A., Hamzah M.R., Sern T.J., Hadi Ayub S., Mohamad E. Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. Plos One, 2020, vol. 15, № 5, pp. e0233668. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233668
  9. Ali S.H., Foreman J., Capasso A., Jones A.M., Tozan Y., Di Clemente R.J. Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility Analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2020, no. 20, pp. 116. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01011-0
  10. Jarvis C.I., Zandvoort K.V., Gimma A., Prem K., CMMID COVID-19 working group, Klepac P., Rubin G.J., Edmunds W.J. Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK. BMC Medicine, 2020, no. 18, pp. 124. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8
  11. Chu D.K., Akl E.A., Duda S., Yaacoub S., Solo K., Schünemann H.J. [et al.] Physical distancing, face masks and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 2020, vol. 395, no. 10242, pp. 1973–1987. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
  12. Vardavas C.I., Nikitara K. COVID-19 and smoking: A systematic review of the evidence. Tob. Induc. Dis, 2020, no. 18, pp. 20. DOI: 10.18332/tid/119324
  13. Gasmi A., Noor S., Tippairote T., Dadar M., Menzel A., Bjørklund G. Individual risk management strategy and potential therapeutic options for the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Immunology, 2020, no. 215, pp. 108409. DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108409
  14. Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, updated 5 June 2020. World Health Organization, 2020, 20 p.
  15. Setti L., Passarini F., De Gennaro G., Barbieri P., Grazia Perrone M., Borelli M., Palmisani J., Di Gilio A. [еt al.]. Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2932. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082932
  16. Yu P., Zhu J., Zhang Z., Han Y. A Familial Cluster of Infection Associated with the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Indicating Possible Person-to-Person Transmission During the Incubation Period. J Infect Dis, 2020, vol. 221, no. 11, pp. 1757–1761. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa077
  17. Arons M.M., Hatfield K.M., Reddy S.C., Kimball A., James A., Jacobs J.R., Taylor J., Spicer K. [et al.]. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility. N Engl J Med, 2020, vol. 382, no. 22, pp. 2081–2090. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008457
  18. Pan X., Chen D., Xia Y., Wu X., Li T., Ou X., Zhou L., Liu J. Asymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect Dis, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 410–411. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30114-6
  19. Eikenberry S.E., Mancuso M., Iboi E., Phan T., Eikenberry K., Kuang Y., Kostelich E., Gumel A.B. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 293–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001
  20. Chou R., Dana T., Buckley D.I., Selph S., Fu R., Totten A.M. [et al.]. Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Coronavirus Infection in Health Care Workers. A Living Rapid Review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020, vol. 21, no. 173 (2), pp. 120–136. DOI: 10.7326/M20-1632
Received: 
14.07.2020
Accepted: 
09.11.2020
Published: 
30.12.2020

You are here

Home