Complex approach to assessing risks and preventing various somatic diseases in workers (employed at furniture production)

View or download the full article: 
UDC: 
613.69:684
Authors: 

N.A. Merkulova1, Yu.Yu. Eliseev2, O.I. Kozhanova1

Organization: 

1Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing, Saratov Region office, 7 Vol'skaya Str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation
2Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, 112 Bol'shaya Kazach'ya Str., Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

At present a number of contemporary furniture production enterprises is growing fast in Saratov region. And simultaneously there is a growth in number of working places that require adequate sanitary-hygienic assessment of their safety.
Our research goal was to perform complex assessment of somatic diseases risks for workers employed at furniture production.
We examined 323 workers employed at «Maria» furniture factory. To perform assessment, we applied sanitary-hygienic, laboratory-instrumental, and statistic research techniques. It was established that 23 % workers had to work under hazardous working conditions (hazard category 3.2); 37 % workers had to work under conditions belonging to hazard category 3.1; 39 % examined workers had optimal and acceptable conditions at their workplaces (category 1–2). Having examined workers’ age groups, we revealed that workers aged 21–30 prevailed among the examined ones and average working experience amounted to 5.4 years for people of this age. The second in number were workers aged 31–40 with their working experience being equal to 8.5 years. At the next stage in our research we examined morbidity among workers employed at furniture production. Thus, it was established that diseases of the nervous system were the most frequent among the examined workers (33.3 %); they were followed by respiratory diseases (20.4 %), cardiovascular diseases (12.1 %), and digestive organs diseases (10.2 %).
The third stage involved examining hereditary burdens on morbidity among workers employed at furniture production. Thus, 108 workers were established to have various diseases and 79.6 % of them had hereditary predisposition.
At the final stage in our research we examined retrospect data on changes in workers’ life quality over 2015. The obtained data were compared with occurrence or absence of new diseases cases over the next three years.

Keywords: 
furniture production, working experience, age, life quality, morbidity, hereditary predisposition, working conditions, workers.
Merkulova N.A., Eliseev Yu.Yu., Kozhanova O.I. Complex approach to assessing risks and preventing various somatic diseases in workers (employed at furniture production). Health Risk Analysis, 2020, no. 3, pp. 117–124. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2020.3.14.eng
References: 
  1. Polezhai M.N. Gigienicheskaya kharakteristika uslovii truda rabochikh v derevoobrabatyvayushchem proizvodstve [Hygienic characteristics of working conditions for workers employed at wood processing production]. Sovremennye podkhody k prodvizheniyu zdorov'ya: materialy II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Gomel', 2008, pp. 87–89 (in Russian).
  2. Polezhai M.N., Sharko B.N., Rad'kova E.A. Gigienicheskaya otsenka uslovii truda na osnovnykh etapakh pererabotki drevesiny [Hygienic assessment of working conditions existing at basic stages in wood processing]. Meditsina truda. Zdorov'e rabotayushchego naseleniya: dostizheniya i perspektivy: materialy ХХХIХ Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Khlopinskie chteniya). Sankt-Peterburg, MAPO Publ., 2009, pp. 204–206 (in Russian).
  3. Polezhai M.N., Chernova G.I., Vorob'eva L.V. Gigienicheskie podkhody k otsenke zdorov'ya naseleniya v raione razmeshcheniya predpriyatii po pererabotke drevesiny [Hygienic approaches to assessing population health on a territory close to wood processing enterprises]. Akademik AMN SSSR Zakharii Grigor'evich Frenkel'. 140 let so dnya rozhdeniya: materialy memorial'noi nauchnoi konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 2009, pp. 338–340 (in Russian).
  4. Trushkova E.A., Oleinikov P.D. Izuchenie sovremennykh metodov diagnostiki professional'nykh zabolevanii [Examining contemporary techniques for occupational diseases diagnostics]. Molodoi uchenyi, 2016, vol. 122, no. 18.1, pp. 27–28 (in Russian).
  5. Smailova L.F. Gigienicheskaya otsenka uslovii truda na predpriyatiyakh tsellyuloznobumazhnoi promyshlennosti [Hygienic assessment of working conditions at pulp and paper productions]. Materialy mezhinstitutskoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 60-letiyu obrazovaniya MGSMU kafedry obshchei gigieny. Moscow, 2006, pp. 18 (in Russian).
  6. Kosarev V.V., Babanov S.A. Health preservation for working population: problems and optimization methods. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya, 2011, no. 1, pp. 3–7 (in Russian).
  7. Trushkova E.A., Volkova N.Yu. Results of studying the problem of the acoustic safety of equipment AT «Krasnokamsky remontno-mekhanichesky zavod» JS. Nauchnoe obozrenie, 2014, no. 11, pp. 528–531 (in Russian).
  8. Trushkova E.A., Volkova N.Yu. Development of activities aimed at preventing injuries and professional diseases AT «Rostvertol» JSC. Nauchnoe obozrenie, 2014, no. 10, pp. 550–553 (in Russian).
  9. Hanson N., Guttman E., Zarsson A. The effect of different holding conditions for environmental monitoring with coge rainbow trouth (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Environ Monit, 2006, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 994–999. DOI: 10.1039/b608862g
  10. Sokolova L.A., Dracheva A.A. Health of workers of sawing and woodaprocessing industry. Ekologiya cheloveka, 2005, no. 6, pp. 44–47 (in Russian).
  11. Bulatova S.I., Kunevskaya E.V. Organizatsiya Gossanepidnadzora na predpriyatiyakh derevoobrabatyvayushchei otrasli [Organization of the State Epidemiologic Surveillance at wood processing enterprises]. Materialy X S"ezda gigienistov i sanitarnykh vrachei. Moscow, 2007, pp. 1024–1027 (in Russian).
  12. Mikkelsen A.B., Schliinssen V., Sigsgaard T., Schaumburg I. Determinants of Wood Dust Exposure in the Danish Furniture Industry. Ann. Hyg, 2002, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 673–685. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mef082
  13. Samigova N.R., Mirsagatova M.R., Barakaev F.I. Izuchenie dinamiki izmenenii v funktsional'nom sostoyanii serdechnososudistoi sistemy rabochikh mebel'nogo proizvodstva [Examining dynamics of changes in functional state of the cardiovascular system of workers employed at furniture production]. Molodoi uchenyi, 2017, vol. 184, no. 50, pp. 126–129 (in Russian).
  14. Cherepanov D., Palta M., Fryback D.G. Underlying dimensions of the five health-related quality-of-life measures used in utility assessment: Evidence from the National Health Measurement Study. Medical Care, 2010, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 718–725. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e35871
  15. Horsman J., Furlong W., Feeny D., Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 54. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54
  16. Baumann C., Erpelding M.L., Perret-Guillaume C., Gautier A., Regat S., Collin J.F., Briancon S. Health-related quality of life in French adolescents and adults: Norms for the DUKE Health Profile. BMC Public Health, 2011, vol. 11, pp. 401. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-401
  17. Hawthorne G. Assessing utility where short measures are required: Development of the short Assessment of Quality of Life-8 (AQoL-8) instrument. Value Health, 2009, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 948–957.
  18. Torosyan A.A. Rasprostranennost' nasledstvenno predraspolozhennykh zabolevanii sredi naseleniya goroda Stepanakerta [Prevalence of hereditary diseases among people living in Stepanakert]. Innovatsionnoe razvitie, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–27 (in Russian).
  19. Govbakh I.A. Populyatsionno-epidemiologicheskie aspekty nasledstvennykh boleznei nervnoi sistemy [Population and epidemiologic aspects of hereditary nervous system diseases]. Science Rise, 2015, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 54–60 (in Russian).
Received: 
05.06.2020
Accepted: 
18.08.2020
Published: 
30.09.2020

You are here