Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production

View or download the full article: 
678: 613.6.02

E.T. Valeeva, L.K. Karimova, R.R. Galimova, N.A. Muldasheva, A.A. Distanova


Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, 94 Stepana Kuvykina Str., Ufa, 450106, Russian Federation


The paper dwells on the results obtained in assessing occupational health risk for workers employed at rubber production; the assessment was based on examining both a priori and a posteriori parameters. It was shown that workers were exposed to a set of factors related to working environment and labor process including hazardous chemicals, in-plant noise, adverse microclimate, as well as physical overloads. Chemical factor played the leading role as there were various chemicals in working area air such as benzene in concentrations equal to 1.2–3.0 MPC (maximum single concentration amounted to 4 MPC); di-chloromethane in concentrations equal to 0.2–1.5 MPC average monthly (maximum single ones equal to 2 MPC). Overall work-ing conditions assessment for workers with different occupations employed at rubber production belonged to 3.2 hazard category. Workers who glued parts of articles together ran high risks of occupational diseases; risks were average for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers. Total occupational diseases index amounted to 0.83 for workers who glued articles and to 0.80 for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers and it meant that occupational risk was high. We also revealed that certain diseases were occupationally induced and the dependence was significant; it was true for segmental disorders in the vegetative nervous system with sensitivity failure in hands for gluing workers (RR – 10.3, CI = 95 %, EF – 90 %), musculoskeletal system diseases (RR – 2.5, CI = 95 %, EF – 55 %), and skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases for spreading machine operators and vulcanizers (RR – 2.6, CI = 95 %, EF – 61 %). We ranked occupations as per related occupational health risks and revealed that workers who glued articles had the highest integral occupational risk assessment.
Occupational risk assessment gave grounds for developing a risk-oriented program that included priorities and ways to prevent damage to health of workers employed at rubber production such as managerial and medical and prevention activities as well as social support and protection.

occupational risk, health, workers, hazardous occupational factors, working conditions, rubber production, occupational diseases, occupationally induced diseases, prevention
Valeeva E.T., Karimova L.K., Galimova R.R., Muldasheva N.A., Distanova A.A. Assessment of occupational health risk for workers employed at contemporary rubber production. Health Risk Analysis, 2020, no. 1, pp. 59–67. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2020.1.06.eng
  1. Valeeva E.T., Karimova L.K., Mavrina L.N., Muldasheva N.A. Occupation al health risk for chemical workers. Gigiena truda, 2016, no. 12, pp. 19–21 (in Russian).
  2. ValeevaE.T., BakirovA.B., KarimovaL.K. Occupational Risks for Chemical Workers’ Health. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, no. 5–6, pp. 124–128 (in Russian).
  3. Valeeva E.T., Karimova L.K., Gimranova G.G. Faktory i pokazateli professional'nogo riska na sovremennykh neftekhimicheskikh predpriyatiyakh Respubliki Bashkortostan [Factors and parameters of occupational risks occurring at con-temporary petrochemical productions in Bashkortostan]. Sovremennye problemy meditsiny truda: materially Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennoi 50-letiyu obrazovaniya UfNII meditsina tru-da i ekologii cheloveka. Ufa, 2005, pp. 82–87 (in Russian).
  4. Khamidulina Kh.Kh. Modern chemical factors’ risk and impact management international requirements and their im-plementation in the system of state sanitary-epidemiologic control. Health Risk Analysis, 2014, no. 2, pp. 14–18. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2014.2.02.eng.
  5. Babanov S.A., Budash D.S., Baikova A.G., Baraeva R.A. Periodic medical examinations and occupational selection in industrial medicine. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2018, vol. 302, no. 5, pp. 48–53 (in Russian).
  6. Barg A.O., Lebedeva-Nesevrya N.A. Risk communication in analysis of occupational health risk for industrial workers. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya, 2015, no. 8, pp. 28–33 (in Russian).
  7. Workers’ health: global plan of action. World Health Organization, 2007. Available at:¬pa-tional_health/publications/global_plan/ru/ (01.10.2017) (in Russian).
  8. Popova A.Yu. Strategic priorities of the Russian Federation in the field of ecology from the position of preservation of health of the nation. Zdorov'e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2014, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 4–7 (in Russian).
  9. Babanov S., Strizhakov L., Budash D., Baikova A. Epidemiological survey strategy and risk assessment in occupational medicine. Vrach, 2018, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 13–19 (in Russian).
  10. DenisovE.I. Professional'nyi risk i profzabolevaniya [Occupational risk and occupational diseases]. Okhrana truda i sotsial'noes trakhovanie, 1999, no. 6, pp. 61–66 (in Russian).
  11. Zheglova A.V. Metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke professional'nogo riska dlya zdorov'ya rabotayushchikh v neblagopriyatnykh usloviyakh truda [Methodical approaches to assessing occupational health risks for workers exposed to adverse working conditions]. Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2008, no. 1, pp. 46–47 (in Russian).
  12. Eliovich I.G., Mel'tser A.V., Yakubova I.Sh., Alloyarov P.R., Istorik O.A., Pankina E.N., Zhirnov A.Yu. Improvement of socio-hygienic monitoring at worker’s occupational conditions with the use of production control. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2017, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 339–343 (in Russian).
  13. Izmerov N.F. Occupational assessment and management are the basis of prophylaxis in occupational medicine. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2006, no. 5, pp. 14–16 (in Russian).
  14. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I., Molodkina N.N. Problema otsenki professional'nogo riska: itogi i perspektivy [Issues re-lated to occupational risks assessment: results and prospects]. Byulleten' nauchnogosoveta «Mediko-ekologicheskie problemy z-dorov'ya rabotayushchikh», 2004, no. 1, pp. 13–15 (in Russian).
  15. Yang J., Bai W.N., Niu P., Tian L., Gao A. Aberrant hypomethylated STAT3 was identified as a biomarker of chronic benzene poisoning through integrating DNA methylation and mRNA expression data. Experimental and Molecular Pathology, 2014, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 346–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2014.02.013
  16. Kerzic P.J.,Liu W.S., Pan M.T., Fu H., Zhou Y., Schnatter A.R., IronsR.D. Analysis of hydroquinone and catechol in peripheral blood of benzene-exposed workers. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 2010, vol. 19, no. 184, pp. 182–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.12.010
  17. Rizzo M., Giannetto C., Longo F., Piccione G., Arfuso F., Giudice E., Di Pietro S. Cortisol levels and leukocyte popu-lation values in transported and exercised horses after acupuncture needle stimulation. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 2017, no. 18, pp. 56–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.12.006
  18. Wen H., Yuan L., Wei C., Zhao Y., Qian Y., Ma P., Ding S., Yang X., Wang X.Effects of combined exposure to for-maldehyde and benzene on immune cells in the blood and spleen in Balb/c mice. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2016, no. 45, pp. 265–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2016.05.007
  19. Schulte P. Challenges for risk assessors. Hum. and Ecol. Risk Assess, 2003, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 439–445. DOI: 10.1080/713609874
  20. Khoruzhaya O.G., Gorblyanskii Yu.Yu., Piktushanskaya T.E. Indicators and criteria of the assessment of quality of medical examinations of workers. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya, 2015, no. 11, pp. 33–37 (in Russian).

You are here