Genetically modified food products: development of safety asseessment system in Russia

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2018-4-14.pdf
UDC: 
614.777; 664.001.25 (07)
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2018.4.14.eng
Authors: 

N.V. Tyshko, E.O. Sadykova

Organization: 

Federal Research Center for Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, 2/14 Ust'inskiy lane, Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

The paper gives an overview of basic approaches to assessing safety of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that are used in food products manufacturing. It contains data on overall volumes of GMOs production in the world and outlines basic trends in development of GMOs safety assessment in the Russian Federation.

In Russia a system for GMOs safety assessment was first created on the basis of domestic experience accumulated via medical and biological research on protein products of microbiological synthesis taking into account all the approaches that existed in the world. A combined algorithm was substantiated; the algorithm includes examinations of GMOs properties and obligatory examinations in vivo: toxicological ones performed via a chronic experiment on rats; allergic ones performed via a modeling experiment on rats; immunologic and genotoxic ones performed via experiments on mice. The system was developed further as, first of all, there was a search for biomarkers that allow to make toxicological research more sensitive; secondly, reproductive functions and offspring development were studied. Experts confirmed that parameters of apoptosis activity could be used as biomarkers; reproductive functions and offspring development were studied over several generations; the most sensitive parameters of rats' reproductive functions were determined under modeled toxic exposure; experts examined an influence exerted on reproductive functions by the seasonal factor and studied prenatal and postnatal development of offspring. New requirements to conducting medical and biological assessment of GMOs were formulated. Starting from 2011, reproductive toxicity of GMOs has been an obligatory part in the state certification of new GM products.

Requirements to safety assessment of GMOs with combined features have been developed on the basis of domestic and international experience; these requirements correspond to regulation principles for GMOs application in food products.

Keywords: 
genetically modified organisms, food products, safety assessment, biological markers
Tyshko N.V., Sadykova E.O. Genetically modified food products: development of safety asseessment system in Russia. Health Risk Analysis, 2018, no. 4, pp. 120–127. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2018.4.14.eng
References: 
  1. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief. No. 52. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY, 2016, 125 p. Available at: https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/52/download/isaaa-br... (10.07.2017).
  2. GM Approval Database. ISAAA Editorial Policy. Available at: http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/ (10.07.2017).
  3. Strategies for assessing the safety of foods produced by biotechnology. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1991. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/41465/9241561459-eng.pdf... (10.07.2017).
  4. Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology: concepts and principles. Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1993, 77 p. https://www.oecd.org/science/biotrack/41036698.pdf (10.07.2017).
  5. Application of the principles of substantial equivalence to the safety evaluation of foods or food components from plants derived by modern biotechnology. Report of a WHO Workshop. Geneva, World Health Organization, WHO/FNU/FOS/95.1. WHO, 1995. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/58909/1/WHO_FNU_FOS_95.1.pdf (10.07.2017).
  6. Biotechnology and food safety. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation. Rome, FAO, 1996. Available at: http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/food/pdf/biotechnology.pdf (10.07.2017).
  7. Mediko-biologicheskie issledovaniya uglevodorodnykh drozhzhei (1964–1970 gg.) [Biomedical studies of hydrocarbon yeast (1964–1970)]. In: A.A. Pokrovskoii ed. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972, 145 p. (in Russian).
  8. Tyshko N.V., Selyaskin K.E., Tutel'yan V.A. Opredelenie naibolee chuvstvitel'nykh metodov dlya otsenki aktivnosti apoptoza v organakh krys na modeli toksicheskogo vozdeistviya tetrakhlormetana [Determination of the most sensitive methods for assessing the activity of apoptosis in rat organs on the model of toxic effects of carbon tetrachloride]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal eksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya, 2015, no. 2–1, pp. 34–36 (in Russian).
  9. Tyshko N.V., Selyaskin K.E., Tutel'yan V.A. Detection of rat internal organs apoptosis activity based on model of ccl4 toxic effects. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya, 2014, no. 10 (pert 5), pp. 993–998 (in Russian).
  10. Tyshko N.V., Selyaskin K.E., Tutel'yan V.A. Ispol'zovanie pokazatelei aktivnosti apoptoza v kachestve sistemnykh biomarkerov pri otsenke bezopasnosti GMO (stat'ya) [Using indicators of apoptosis activity as systemic biomarkers in assessing the safety of GMOs (article)]. Transgennye rasteniya: tekhnologii sozdaniya, biologicheskie svoistva, primenenie, biobezopas-nost': Materialy V Vserossiiskogo simpoziuma. Moscow, 2014, pp. 192–195 (in Russian).
  11. Tyshko N.V., Selyaskin K.E., Tutel'yan V.A. Pokazateli aktivnosti apoptoza v kachestve chuvstvitel'nykh biomarkerov pri otsenke bezopasnosti pishchevoi produktsii, poluchennoi s ispol'zovaniem sovremennykh biotekhnologii [Indicators of apoptosis activity as a sensitive biomarker in assessing the safety of food products obtained using modern biotechnology]. Sovremennye tekhnologii produktov pitaniya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Kursk, 2014, pp. 210–213 (in Russian).
  12. Shestakova S.I., Zhminchenko V.M., Pashorina V.A., Sadykova E.O., Timonin A.N., Tyshko N.V. Izmenenie ak-tivnosti apoptoza v organakh krys linii Vistar na raznykh etapakh ontogeneticheskogo razvitiya [Changes in the activity of apop-tosis in the organs of Wistar rats at different stages of ontogenetic development]. Voprosy pitaniya, 2015, vol. 84 (prilozhenie), no. 3, pp. 172–174 (in Russian).
  13. Sadykova E.O., Tyshko N.V., Khismatullina Z.R. Ispol'zovanie pokazatelei apoptoza v kachestve biomarkerov vozde-istviya ekotoksikantov [Using apoptosis indicators as biomarkers of exposure to ecotoxicants]. Materialy shkoly molodykh uchenykh «Osnovy zdorovogo pitaniya i puti profilaktiki alimentarno-zavisimykh zabolevanii». Moscow, 2016, pp. 201–205 (in Russian).
  14. Utembaeva N.T., Pashorina V.A., Selyaskin K.E., Tyshko N.V. Methodical approaches to studying influence of sea-sonal factor on rat reproductive function in experiments on alimentary influence. Voprosy pitaniya, 2009, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 43–48 (in Russian).
  15. Tyshko N.V., Zhminchenko V.M., Pashorina V.A., Saprykin V.P., Selyaskin K.E., Utembaeva N.T., Tutel'yan V.A. Assessment of the impact of GMO of plant origin on rat progeny development in 3 generations. Voprosy pitaniya, 2011, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 14–28 (in Russian).
  16. Zhminchenko V.M., Pashorina V.A., Selyaskin K.E., Tyshko N.V. Otsenka reproduktivnoi toksichnosti v mediko-biologicheskikh issledovaniyakh biotekhnologicheskoi produktsii: osobennosti postanovki eksperimenta [Assessment of repro-ductive toxicity in biomedical research of biotechnological products: features of the experiment]. Voprosy pitaniya, 2014, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 258–259 (in Russian).
  17. Tyshko N.V., Zhminchenko V.M., Selyaskin K.E., Pashorina V.A., Utembaeva N.T., Tutelyan V.A. Assessment of the impact of genetically modified LibertyLink® maize on reproductive function and progeny development of Wistar rats in three generations. Toxicology Reports, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 330–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.05.013
  18. Tyshko N.V., Zhminchenko V.M., Pashorina V.A., Saprykin V.P., Selyaskin K.E., Utembaeva N.T., Tutel'yan V.A. Evaluation of the effect of genetically modified plants on rat progeny development. Gigiena i sanitariya, 2011, no. 6, pp.73–77.
  19. Tyshko N.V., Selyaskin K.E., Mel'nik E.A., Pashorina V.A., Zhminchenko V.M. The separate and combined effects of calcium pantothenate deficiency and cadmium intoxication on rat reproductive function. Voprosy pitaniya, 2012, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 33–43 (in Russian).
  20. Vasil I.K. The science and politics of plant biotechnology – a personal perspective. Nature biotechnology, 2003, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 849–851.
  21. Parisi C., Tillie P., Rodríguez-Cerezo E. The global pipeline of GM crops out to 2020. Nature Biotechnology, 2016, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–36. DOI:10.1038/nbt.3449.
  22. Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events. EFSA Journal, 2007, vol. 512, pp. 1–5.
  23. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 of 3 April 2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:157:000... (10.07.2017).
  24. Proposed Rule: Premarket Notice Concerning Bioengineered Foods. Federal Register, 66. US Food and Drug Admin-istration. Washington, FDA, 2001, pp. 4706–4738.
  25. Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Scientific Opinion on Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J. EFSA, 2011, vol. 2150, pp. 1–37.
  26. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/ (10.07.2017).
  27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Available at: http://www.oecd.org/ (10.07.2017).
  28. Kramer C., Brune P., McDonald J., Nesbitt M., Sauve A., Storck-Weyhermueller S. Evolution of risk assessment strategies for food and feed uses of stacked GM events. Plant Biotechnol. J., 2016, pp. 1–15. Available at: https://www.on¬line-library.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pbi.12551 (10.07.2017).
  29. Weber N., Halpin C., Hannah L.C., Jez J.M., Kough J., Parrott W. Editor's choice: crop genome plasticity and its rel-evance to food and feed safety of genetically engineered breeding stacks. Plant Physiol, 2012, vol. 160, pp. 1842–1853.
  30. De Schrijver A., Devos Y., Van den Bulckea M., Cadot P., De Loose M., Reheul D., Sneyers M. Risk assessment of GM stacked events obtained from crosses between GM events. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2007, vol. 18, pp. 101–109. DOI:10.1111/pbi.12551
  31. Kok E., Pedersen J., Onori R., Sowa S., Schauzu M., De Schrijver A., Teeri T. Plants with stacked genetically modified events: to assess or not to assess? Trends Biotechnol., 2014, vol. 32, pp. 70–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.12.001
Received: 
16.09.2018
Accepted: 
18.12.2018
Published: 
30.12.2018

You are here

Home