Application of baby walkers in Russia: Epidemiological aspects

View or download the full article: 
PDF icon health-risk-analysis-2018-3-7.pdf
UDC: 
612.084: 685.3
DOI: 
10.21668/health.risk/2018.3.07.eng
Authors: 

A.N. Sharov1, A.V. Krivova1, S.S. Rodionova2

Organization: 

1Tver State Medical University, 4 Sovetskaya Str., Tver, 170100, Russian Federation
2N.N. Priorov's National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, 10 Priorova Str., 127299, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract: 

As per various research data, from 42% to 90% families all over the world use baby walkers. There are some data implying that baby walkers prevent motor skills from their natural development and are to a certain extent dangerous for infants' health. Prevalence of damages associated with baby walkers varies from 7% to 50% according to different estimations. Our research goals were to determine reasons for application of baby walkers in Russia and their prevalence in Russian families; to assess levels and structure of children injuries caused by baby walkers and their influence on motor development and on walking pattern formation.

We performed three cohort pieces of research with pseudo-retrospective design. The overall sampling included 749 children; "baby-walker" groups consisted of 363 infants. We also performed an anamnestic questioning of parents with specially designed anonymous questionnaires. The research was accomplished on typical Russian territories (Rzhev and Rzhev district in Tver' region, population amounts to approximately 60.3 thousand people).

We detected that frequency with which baby walkers were applied among children on the examined territories was similar to average frequency detected worldwide and amounted to 62.11±18.5%. Parents think that basic advantages and reasons for application of baby walkers are as follows: they make a child to develop faster; they keep a baby busy and help to keep it safe; they entertain a baby; it is a tradition. The detected level of injuries caused by baby walkers was relatively low (15.4%). There were no injuries that require medical aid. Our research didn't reveal any statistically authentic influence exerted by baby walkers on formation of acquired static deformations in infancy. There is also no statistically authentic discrepancy between children from "baby walkers" group and "without baby walkers" group in the examined sampling when they reach the following stages in their development: "standing with a support" and "moving with a support". But on average, children who grew with baby walkers started to walk on their own with a 13-day delay. We detected a statistically authentic strong correlation (p<0.01) between application of baby walkers and risk of tiptoe walking (RR=3.56; CI 2.56–4.99 for 95% provision). A longer period of tiptoe walking in "baby walkers" group confirms that baby walkers exert long-term negative influence on walking pattern structure. We detected the following additional (attributable) population risk (PAR): absence of walking on one's own, PAR=4.45%–5.3%; tiptoe walking, PAR=19.6%–23.4%. Application of baby walkers in families from the examined population decreased from 52.03% to 43.66% and it means that active informative campaigns aimed at explaining baby walkers dangers to parents and guardians were quite efficient.

It is advisable to perform further research on the matter.

Keywords: 
baby walkers, children injuries, stages in motor development, delay in onset of walking, tiptoe walking, idiopathic toe-walking
Sharov A.N., Krivova A.V., Rodionova S.S. Application of baby walkers in Russia: epidemiological aspects. Health Risk Analysis, 2018, no. 3, pp. 63–75. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2018.3.07.eng
References: 
  1. Kauffman I.B., Ridenour M. Influence of an infant walker on onset and quality of walking pattern of locomotion: an elec-tromyographic investigation. Perceptual and motor skills, 1977, vol. 45, no. 3f, pp. 1323–1329. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1323
  2. Ridenour M.V. Infant walkers: developmental tool or inherent danger. Perceptual and motor skills, 1982, vol. 55, no. 3f, pp. 1201–1202. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.3f.1201
  3. Crouchman M. The effects of baby walkers on early locomotor development. Developmental Medicine & Child Neu-rology, 1986, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 757–761. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749. 1986.tb03929.x
  4. Thein M.M., Lee J., Tay V., Ling S.L. Infant walker use, injuries, and motor development. Injury Prevention, 1997, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63–66. DOI: 10.1136/ip.3.1.63
  5. Siegel A.C., Burton R.V. Effects of baby walkers on motor and mental development in human infants. Journal of De-velopmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 1999, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 355–360. DOI: 10.1097/00004703-199910000-00010
  6. Garrett M., McElroyet A.M., Staines A. Locomotor milestones and baby walkers: cross sectional study. BMJ, 2002, vol. 324, no. 7352, pp. 1494. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1494
  7. Shiva F., Ghotbi F., Yavari S.F. The use of baby walkers in Iranian infants. Singapore medical journal, 2010, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 645–649.
  8. Engelbert R.H.H., Van Empelen R., Scheurer N.D., Helders P.J.M., Van Nieuwenhuizenl O. Influence of infant-walkers on motor development: mimicking spastic diplegia? European Journal of Pediatric Neurology, 1999, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 273–275. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-3798 (99) 90982-0
  9. Sharov A.N., Krivova A.V. Vliyanie detskikh khodunkov na razvitie dvigatel'nykh navykov u mladentsev [Effect of Baby Walkers on the Development of Locomotor Skills in Infants]. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii imeni N.N. Priorova, 2016, no. 3, pp. 40–46 (in Russian).
  10. Krivova A.V., Sharov A.N. Baby walkers and the phenomenon of toe-walking. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–32. DOI: 10.17816/ptors6123-32
  11. Santos S.L. Paricio Talayero J.M., Salom Pérez A., Grieco Burucúa M., Martín Ruano J., Benlloch Muncharaz M.J., Llobat Estellés T., Beseler Soto B. Patterns of use, popular beliefs and proneness to accidents of a baby walker (go-cart). Bases for a health information campaign. Anales espanoles de pediatria, 1996, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 337–340.
  12. Trinkoff A., Parks P.L. Prevention strategies for infant walker-related injuries. Public Health Reports, 1993, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 784.
  13. Laffoy M., Fitzpatrick P., Jordan M., Dowdall D. Attitudes to and use of baby walkers in Dublin. Injury prevention, 1995, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109–111. DOI: 10.1136/ip.1.2.109
  14. Bar-on M. E., Boyle R. M., Endriss E. K. Parental decisions to use infant walkers. Injury prevention, 1998, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 299–300. DOI: 10.1136/ip.4.4.299
  15. Kendrick D., Marsh P. Babywalkers: prevalence of use and relationship with other safety practices. Injury Prevention, 1998, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 295–298. DOI: 10.1136/ip.4.4.295
  16. DiLillo D., Damashek A., Peterson L. Maternal use of baby walkers with young children: recent trends and possible alternatives. Injury Prevention, 2001, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 223–227. DOI: 10.1136/ip.7.3.223
  17. Tan N.C., Lim L.H., Gu K. Factors influencing caregiver's use of an infant walker.Asia Pacific Family Medicine, 2003, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–22. DOI: 10.1046/j.1444-1683.2003.00045
  18. Shiva F., Ghotbi F., Yavari S.F. The use of baby walkers in Iranian infants. Singapore medical journal, 2010, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 645–649.
  19. Dogan D.G., Bilici M., Yilmaz A.E., Catal F., Keles N. Baby walkers: a perspective from Turkey. Acta paediatrica, 2009, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 1656–1660. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01397
  20. Grivna M., Barss P., Al-Hanaee A., Al-Dhahab A., Al-Kaabi F., Al-Muhairi S. Baby walker injury awareness among grade-12 girls in a high-prevalence Arab country in the Middle East. Asia-Pacific journal of public health, 2015, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. NP1507–NP1516. DOI: 10.1177/1010539513498766
  21. Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention. Injuries Associated With Infant Walkers. Pediatrics, 2001, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 790–792. DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.3.790
  22. Fazen L.E., Felizberto P.I. Baby walker injuries. Pediatrics, 1982, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 106–109.
  23. Wishon P.M., Huang A., Spangler R.S. Hazard Patterns and Injury Prevention with Infant Walkers and Strollers. 1989, 17 p.
  24. Shields B.J., Smith G.A. Success in the Prevention of Infant Walker–Related Injuries: An Analysis of National Data, 1990–2001. Pediatrics, 2006, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. e452–e459. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1916
  25. Chiaviello C.T., Christoph R.A., Bond G.R. Infant walker-related injuries: a prospective study of severity and inci-dence. Pediatrics, 1994, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 974–976.
  26. Petridou E., Simou E., Skondras C., G Pistevos., Lagos P., Papoutsakis G. Hazards of baby walkers in a European context. Injury Prevention, 1996, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–120. DOI: 10.1136/ip.2.2.118
  27. Smith G.A., Jo Bowman M., Luria J.W., Shields B.J. Babywalker-related injuries continue despite warning labels and public education. Pediatrics, 1997, vol. 100, no. 2. Available at: http: //pediatrics.aappub¬li¬ca¬tions.org/content/100/2/e1 (18.04.2018).
  28. Rieder M.J., Schwartz C., Newman J. Patterns of Walker Use and Walker Injury. Pediatric Emergency Care, 1987, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59. DOI: 10.1097/00006565-198703000-00022
  29. Partington M.D., Swanson J.A., Meyer F.B. Head injury and the use of baby walkers: a continuing problem. Annals of emergency medicine, 1991, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 652–654. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644 (05) 82386-8
  30. Coats T.J., Allen M. Baby walker related injuries--a continuing problem. Emergency Medicine Journal, 1991, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 52–55. DOI: 10.1136/emj.8.1.52
  31. Walker J.M., Fagard R., Narkiewicz K., Redón J., Zanchetti A., Böhm M., Christiaens T., Cifkova R., De Backer G., Dominiczak A., Galderisi M., Grobbee D.E., Jaarsma T., Kirchhof P., Kjeldsen S.E., Laurent S., Manolis A.J., Nilsson P.M., Ruilope L.M., Schmieder R.E., Sirnes P.A., Sleight P., Viigimaa M., Waeber B., Zannad F.; Task Force Members. Hazardous baby walkers: a survey of use. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 1996, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–30. DOI: 10.1097/00001577-199600810-00005
  32. Mancini M.C., Magalhães L.C. Clinical Scenario. 2007.
  33. Burrows P., Griffiths P. Do baby walkers delay onset of walking in young children? British journal of community nursing, 2002, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 581–586.
  34. Sala D.A., Shulman L.H., Kennedy R.F., Grant A.D., Y Chu M.L. Idiopathic toe-walking: A review. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 1999, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 846–848. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162299001681
  35. Shulman L.H., Sala D.A., Y Chu M.L., McCaul P.R., Sandler B.J. Developmental implications of idiopathic toe walk-ing. The Journal of pediatrics, 1997, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 541–546. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476 (97) 70236-1
  36. Tidwell M. The child with tip-toe gait. International Pediatrics, 1999, vol. 14, pp. 235–238.
  37. Brouwer B., Davidson L.K., Olney S.J. Serial casting in idiopathic toe-walkers and children with spastic cerebral palsy. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2000, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 221–225. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-200003000-00017
  38. Fragniere B., Garoflid N., Dutoit M. Mon enfant marche sur la pointe des pieds. Revue médicale de la Suisse romande, 2000, vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 811–814.
  39. Stricker S.J. Evaluation and treatment of the child with tiptoe gait. International Pediatrics, 2006, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 91.
  40. Sutherland D.H., Olshen R.A., Cooper L. The development of mature gait. J. Bone. Joint. Surg. Am., 1980, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 336–353. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198062030-00004
  41. Martín-Casas P., Ballestero-Pérez R., Meneses-Monroy A., Beneit-Montesinos J.V., Atín-Arratibel M.A., Portellano-Pérez J.A. Neurodevelopment in preschool idiopathic toe-walkers. Neurología (English Edition), 2017, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 446–454. DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.02.006
  42. Onis M. WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Paediatrica, 2006, vol. 95, no. S450, pp. 86–95.
  43. Shafeek M.M., El-Negmy E.H. Pilot Study: The Onto Ward Effect of Baby Walker Usage on Gait Pattern in Three Years Normal Children. Med. J. Cairo Univ., 2016, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 379–383.
Received: 
29.05.2018
Accepted: 
21.09.2018
Published: 
30.09.2018

You are here

Home